tearjerker director

In fact, regarding the issue of giving up your seat, the situation in "Search" is actually somewhat disconnected from reality.

Because nowadays it can be said that when it comes to news about not giving up your seat, most of the time, the target of people's condemnation is not the person who refuses to give up his seat. Instead, many similar news are because some people think that young people should give up their seats, and they are even beaten if they don't give up their seats. news.

So most people are condemning this kind of people.

Of course, Ye Lanqiu's refusal to give up his seat in "Search" was actually just an inducement, and this was not actually the target of the online violence.

This is why many people say that the story of "Search" is "a big deal"!
But more people commented instead: "The great thing about Director Dog is that even though the things in "Search" are really trivial, the results are still very exciting!"

""Search" is indeed a movie about a series of subsequent events triggered by "big shit", but it is also a movie that sees the big from the small and makes people think after watching it. It has a smooth narrative. , a modern-themed movie with a strong sense of rhythm, in which cyber violence is fully exaggerated and displayed. The so-called crowd wins gold, nothing better than this.

Although the performance of each character is somewhat symbolic, the overall character performance is still remarkable. There is the love between Yang Shoucheng and Ye Lanqiu, the authoritarian Shen Liushu, the female awakening Mo Xiaoyu, and the fear that the world will not be chaotic. reporter Chen Ruoxi, the scheming Tang Xiaohua and Yang Jiaqi in the workplace, the eccentric newspaper director, the ranting aunt on the bus, the many netizens who fanned the flames, etc., all these beings with their own characteristics all witnessed this impetuous life together. The hustle and bustle of social development more or less reflects the life of real society.

"Search" examines the butterfly effect caused by a "big shit" from a contemporary perspective. Internet verbal violence is a topic worthy of attention, and the protection of personal privacy is also a very real issue. Although this work has some such and such There are some dissatisfactions, such as the love between the two is not exaggerated enough, the incident on the bus is not realistic enough, etc., but we have to admit that what happened in the movie is really that exaggerated and unreal? "

Film critic Du Xianghai wrote:

"You can't just look at the surface of anything. Although "Search" was triggered by a small incident, in reality, look at the things on the hot search list. How many big incidents are there?
For example, if a celebrity can be trending even while sleeping, isn't this a big deal?
Looking at the essence through the phenomenon, the entire film "Search" is simply a few keywords: mainly public opinion orientation, media literacy, and of course, the professional ethics of journalists.

Let’s talk about the orientation of public opinion first.

It is obvious from the film that reporter Chen Ruoxi led the audience in an extreme direction right from the start, that is, Ye Lanqiu's refusal to give up his seat is a moral corruption, a loss of humanity, a crime worthy of death, and must be criticized by public opinion and condemned by society. condemn.

Chen Ruoxi is a very ambitious reporter. Although she knew clearly that reporters were only reporting news facts, she was lost under the temptation of utilitarianism.First, he removed Yang Jiaqi from the news, took all the achievements by himself, instantly became a celebrity in the industry, and dominated public opinion. Then he ignored Ye Lanqiu's apology video, and also led the interviewees to make unfavorable remarks against Ye Lanqiu. , and even more so to avenge a private vendetta, using a pen to retaliate against Ye Lanqiu for stealing her boyfriend!
Are there many reporters like Chen Ruoxi in reality?I don't know, but I know there must be!

Especially in the era of self-media, authority has long been lost, and what is mostly pursued is no longer authority, but traffic and eyeballs.

Often as long as they can capture attention, they can break through any bottom line.

I remember a media person said: Maybe we can’t know the truth, and reporters don’t know either. Reporters can only and must present the entire incident completely to the audience. What happened is a fact; only the judge can Sentencing a person, not the reporter, let alone the audience.

However, "Search" has revealed the darkest side of current public opinion. We all know that whether Ye Lanqiu is right or wrong is definitely not a matter that Chen Ruoxi has the final say on, but the role of Chen Ruoxi is very interesting. It truly reflects the current situation of a journalism world.

Faced with quantifiable numbers such as ratings, audience attention, retweets, comments, etc., reporters continue to dig out some so-called newsworthy news. To put it bluntly, any relevant social conflicts will cause great repercussions and make reporters After becoming successful and famous, amplifying these contradictions and constantly intensifying them through words and lenses has become a passion of many journalists.

Sometimes people can't help but reflect. Every day when you turn on the TV and open the newspaper, you are filled with negative news. Do the public really need to be fed so much negative information to make them believe that our society is on the verge of collapse?If this continues, will we return to the era of pornographic news?
Especially now that short videos are popular, it can be said to be particularly scary. I remember a friend complained to me that my wife at home watched short videos every day, and big data pushed her some negative news every day, such as her concern about food. Safety, so big data began to brainwash her by repeatedly pushing related food safety incidents that occurred across the country. As a result, his wife is now almost unwilling to eat out and check the ingredients of food when shopping, which makes him suffer. It was unspeakable, and they even complained that if this continued, their whole family would starve to death.

Many of us understand that news reports are often about “special events,” but survivorship bias is everywhere these days.

Back to the topic, let’s imagine that if Chen Ruoxi was not responsible for the Ye Lanqiu incident, but Yang Jiaqi was responsible for it, at the beginning of the incident, what we saw was that Ye Lanqiu acted wildly on the bus and refused to give up his seat, and the report came out, Everyone is talking about it, and there is no problem with this.Next, Ye Lanqiu self-reflected, made a video to apologize to the whole society, and continued to report it, so that everyone could see that Ye Lanqiu was remorseful. At this time, maybe everyone would start to relax a little, and then continue Digging deeper, Ye Lanqiu was a good student with excellent academic performance in middle school. The whole school was proud of her. Why would such a person do such a thing on the bus?What's the secret?Follow this and continue to dig deeper, and the path ahead will be completely different.

In fact, many times when we receive a message, we will not make a judgment on whether the message is right or wrong for a while. But once the guidance of public opinion is added, we can easily make a judgment, whether we follow the public opinion or not. Whether to make judgment A or to do the opposite and make judgment B, such a result may have been processed and transformed by the media.That’s why we repeatedly emphasize that reporting facts is not the truth, let alone judging right or wrong.

However, "Search" bluntly reveals how the current media is doing. They are no longer satisfied with just reporting the facts. Instead, they prefer to use invisible hands to seal the coffin and conclude something. definition.

Let’s talk about media literacy.To put it simply, in today's society with developed media, there are no longer pure audiences and transmitters. Everyone is both an audience and a transmitter, just like Weibo. In the process of forwarding, everyone has already completed a post. The process of transforming the audience into the identity of the communicator also completes a secondary communication.In this way, everyone is required to have good media literacy and be able to judge the meaning and value of media information.

There was a scene in the film that impressed me deeply, that is, Ye Lanqiu went to a housekeeping company to find a nanny, but was criticized verbally and verbally. Before leaving, he was photographed by onlookers and posted on the Internet. The relationship between Yang Shoucheng and Ye Lanqiu was also instantly described. Black, causing Chen Ruoxi to retaliate.Many people may think after reading it, is it a bit exaggerated?

But in fact, it is really not an exaggeration at all!
Because many times, the information received by the public is very one-sided. If it only reports facts and makes objective evaluations, then maybe people who receive this information will think about it. But when the media reports an event in the name of authority, After characterization, then they don't need to think about it at all.

Everyone seems to be blinded and cannot tell right from wrong. When a person's shortcomings are magnified infinitely under the camera, no one will explore the person's advantages. But in fact, this person is not without advantages, but everyone Ignore was chosen.

When the high-achieving student's murder case caused a huge uproar at that time, all public opinions initially portrayed the top student from a prestigious university as a murderous demon who did not blink an eye, a murderer with an extremely dark heart. Everyone was saying something wrong about him. He is as bad as he is, but in fact, there is a lot of sadness behind the other party committing such a crime, and he has always been a very kind and filial person.

After the media corrected the report later, everyone suddenly realized it and began to express their feelings of regret for him, saying that he was a good boy and those who were killed were the bad boys.The result of low media literacy is that everyone can only be led by the media. And under the premise that the media is not sure about the direction of public opinion, people are very worried about whether the path they are leading is the right path or a narrow path.

Finally, I have to say that Shen Liushu is an expert in public relations. In order to do a good job in crisis public relations, he can ignore the feelings of his wife, the years of marriage, and the life and death of Ye Lanqiu, an old employee. He randomly sets wedding anniversaries and breaks fake news. , shed tears in front of the scene, framed Chen Ruoxi, and other tricks made the fight between him and Chen Ruoxi very interesting. "

When a movie becomes popular, the characters in it will naturally be criticized by many people.

Ye Lanqiu and Yang Shoucheng will not say more.

The most controversial person is not Chen Ruoxi, Tang Xiaohua, or Mo Xiaoyu, but the character Yang Jiaqi.

Some people think that the Ye Lanqiu incident in "Search" would have a completely different result if it were reported by Yang Jiaqi, saying that Yang Jiaqi pays more attention to the truth.

But some people also think that Yang Jiaqi is the most disgusting character in the entire movie.

On the contrary, it is Chen Ruoxi. Although this role is a little controversial, one thing is unquestionable.That is, this is the most straightforward "evil" character in the entire movie.

Comments on the Internet: "If you have to find a bad guy in the film, then this bad guy must be Chen Ruoxi. There is nothing wrong with her reporting social news, and it does not mean she is wrong to attribute other people's films to her own name. Her moral corruption is at best as despicable as that of the second secretary. But when she learned that her boyfriend had eloped with someone else, she resolutely used the media to avenge her personal vendetta, fabricating the fact that Ye Lanqiu was the mistress without any evidence, and exposing it On the Internet, she has been the rumor maker and spreader of the entire incident from beginning to end, and can also be said to be the biggest external cause of Ye Lanqiu's death. This also led to Shen Liushu's final murder."

As for Yang Jiaqi's controversy, the official view is somewhat similar to that of Du Xianghai. They both believe that Yang Jiaqi just did what a reporter should do. She has a very keen sense of smell for media people, so she photographed Ye Lanqiu without giving up her seat. event.

But Yang Jiaqi did not do evil in this incident, but she also filmed Ye Lanqiu's apology video, so some people think that Yang Jiaqi may not be a good person, but at least she is not a perpetrator.

But the other party felt that Chen Ruoxi's badness could be directly seen, while Yang Jiaqi was hypocritical.

They also presented evidence to support their views.

The most convincing point is: "When everyone was criticizing Ye Lanqiu, Yang Jiaqi was one of the few who knew the truth and held Ye Lanqiu's apology video. But what did she do? ? She didn’t do anything. This is a greater evil. Why didn’t she do anything?

She was a reporter, even a trainee reporter, but she didn't do that. The first reason was because she was afraid of offending Chen Ruoxi, and the second reason?It doesn't seem to do her any good!
We have no way to ask someone, even if the other person is a reporter, to defend Ye Lanqiu, but Yang Jiaqi is different. She is the instigator of the entire incident. She shot the first video, and she was also the one who interviewed Ye Lanqiu. Then she chose to turn a blind eye and let Chen Ruoxi and the Internet mobs conduct cyber violence against Ye Lanqiu. This behavior was even more hateful!
Not only that, but also remember that after Chen Ruoxi learned that Ye Lanqiu and her boyfriend Yang Shoucheng were together, wasn't the last article reported by insiders the product of Chen Ruoxi's dictation of Yang Jiaqi's code words?And how excited Yang Jiaqi was at that time...

And you have to know that Yang Shoucheng is Yang Jiaqi's cousin. It's really righteous to kill a relative!So, some people actually think Yang Jiaqi is better than Chen Ruoxi?Simply!

So if Chen Ruoxi is a "bad person", then Yang Jiaqi is a hypocritical villain!

Chen Ruoxi can ignore the truth for the sake of fame and fortune, but Yang Jiaqi is even more awesome. For the sake of fame and fortune, she can choose to use the long-lost apology video to benefit herself after Ye Lanqiu's death!Isn't such a person even more terrifying? "