Becoming a lawyer starts with raising a Xiezhi

Chapter 338 Tragedy
Meng Lang didn't ask Cao Yunlong about the facts of the case, because the facts of the case were already clear, so he asked some things related to the case, so that the court could know the motive and reason of Cao Yunlong's murder, so that the observers could listen and learn from it. Get some lessons and inspiration.

An excellent defense must not only reduce the punishment of the parties involved, but also allow all litigation participants to accept your defense and make others sound like a spring breeze, which not only has the effect of defense, but also does not stimulate the family members of the victim Emotions.

After Meng Lang finished asking, Wang Wei's lawyer asked him a few questions, mainly asking him who suggested killing people to silence him. Cao Yunlong replied that it was Li Fengke.

After Wang Wei's lawyer finished asking questions, Li Fengke's lawyer asked again. Li Fengke's lawyer asked more questions, mainly asking who killed Wu Shaoping's father-in-law and mother-in-law after he entered the scene. Cao Yunlong replied that it was Wang Wei and Li Fengke. The two killed together.

After the interrogation, the judge asked the judicial police to bring both Wang Wei and Li Fengke up, and the court entered the stage of presenting evidence and cross-examination.

The public prosecutor presents evidence, and the defense attorney conducts cross-examination.

The evidence collected by the investigative agency is relatively complete, including sharp knives, ropes and other crime tools, which were left at the scene. It can be said that what these three people committed was definitely a reckless robbery. It's a chicken feather all over the place, just kill the person and it's over.

Of course, this also reflects that the three of them are more brutal and reckless in their actions, and they are extremely harmful to society.

Li Fengke originally wanted to quibble, but after Meng Lang used his dim eyes on him, his mind has been in a state of insensitivity, so he accepted any evidence presented by the public prosecutor, and his lawyer couldn't help him when he saw this. defense, so the production of evidence and cross-examination progressed relatively smoothly.

After the evidence and cross-examination were completed, the court debate phase entered.

First, the public prosecutor shall issue a public prosecution opinion.

The public prosecutor made an overall public prosecution conclusion based on the facts of the whole case, and believed that Wang Wei, Li Fengke and Cao Yunlong ignored the laws of the state, robbed others, and caused six deaths. They were suspected of robbery, and the amount of robbery was 520 yuan. This number is the money that Cao Yunlong dug out from Wu Shaoping's pocket.

The three committed a joint crime. According to the facts and evidence of the whole case, the three conspired together and divided the work. The roles played by the three were equivalent. Therefore, the principal and accomplices should not be distinguished, and the criminal responsibility of the three should be investigated for the crime of robbery.

The public prosecutor spoke for 10 minutes. At the end, the public prosecutor also mentioned the tragedy of Cao Yunlong's family. He believed that the heinous crimes committed by Cao Yunlong had a lot to do with his failure to properly handle the family relationship.

After the public prosecutor finished his public prosecution opinions, it was Wang Wei's defender's turn to express his defense opinions.

I saw Wang Wei's lawyer said slowly: "This defender believes that the charges charged by the public prosecution agency are wrong. Although Wang Wei and the three of them planned in advance, after they arrived at the scene, they never asked Wu Shaoping for money from the beginning to the end. They only asked for money. When it came to borrowing money, they did not mention stealing money, so their actions should constitute the crime of intentional homicide. After the murder, the third defendant, Cao Yunlong, took more than 1 yuan from Wu Shaoping, which should constitute the crime of theft. Several crimes should be punished together. Wang Wei only killed two people at the scene, and the other four were not killed by Wang Wei. After the incident, Wang Wei sincerely pleaded guilty and repented. He suggested that Wang Wei should be given a lighter punishment. At the same time, Wang Wei is willing to compensate the victim Family members can also be given a lighter punishment. In summary, I hope the collegial panel will give Wang Wei a fair sentence after comprehensively considering the circumstances of Wang Wei's crime."

Meng lang didn't expect Wang Wei's defense lawyer to think that Wang Wei and the three of them did not rob, but murdered on purpose.It is true that they killed someone, but it depends on what their subjective purpose is. From the very beginning, Wang Wei and the other three were there to rob Wu Shaoping. Murder is just a means for them to rob, and if there is any connection between the purpose and the means, it is a felony to be dealt with.

Although intentional homicide is also a felony, the crime of robbery and homicide is more serious, and this is also in line with the principle of consistency of subjectivity and objectivity. As for, they did not say what they meant to rob when they arrived at the scene, but their intentions were obvious, so there was no If you want to rob money, it is because the situation develops too fast, people are killed when they come up, and Wu Shaoping is killed because of Wu Shaoping's resistance, so this does not affect the nature of their robbery .

After Wang Wei's lawyer delivered his defense opinion, Li Fengke's lawyer began to defend Li Fengke: "This defender believes that the principal and accessory criminals should be distinguished in this case. In this case, Li Fengke and Cao Yunlong both obeyed Wang Wei's command. , it was Wang Wei who proposed to rob Wu Shaoping, and it was Wang Wei who took the lead in killing people, and there were two people in one kill. In this case, Li Fengke and Cao Yunlong had no chance to choose. It’s just that there is only one way to go to the dark, so Wang Wei should be the principal offender, while Li Fengke and Cao Yunlong are the accomplices, and Li Fengke, as an accomplice, only played an assisting role, and should be given a lighter punishment..."

Li Fengke's lawyer had prepared a lot of defense statements. As long as Li Fengke didn't admit to killing so many people, he could defend him for a lesser crime. However, when Meng Lang interrogated Li Fengke, he also admitted to killing several people. It's not good to say this anymore, so I have to defend Li Fengke from the perspective of the principal and accessory criminals.

Although his defense is difficult to establish, because the three of them really can't distinguish between the principal and the accomplice, it is a bit far-fetched for him to say that Li Fengke is an accomplice, but he must defend in this way, otherwise there will be no argument. Money, if there is no debate head, it will be dissatisfied.

After Li Fengke's lawyer finished speaking, it was Meng Lang's turn to deliver his defense.

Meng Lang looked at the court and began to talk: "Legally speaking, this case is a robbery and murder of a bad nature. The three defendants can be said to have committed a heinous crime. However, if you look at it from another perspective, they have to It is said that this is a family tragedy. My client, Cao Yunlong, lived in poverty since he was a child. Because he went to work in the city, he met the victim Wu Bing and fell in love. This was definitely the beginning of a beautiful relationship, but I didn't expect that it would not be a beautiful relationship. At the end of the film, as Wu Bing's husband, Cao Yunlong must have his shining side. Otherwise, it is impossible for a rich girl to fall in love with a poor boy. The Wu family can accept him in the end, which is not only a victory for Cao Yunlong, but also a victory for Cao Yunlong. A tragic beginning..."

(End of this chapter)