A great man of the Northern Song Dynasty

The content of the latest chapter is a continuation of the previous chapter, regarding the issue of the effeminacy of Imperial College students.

I accidentally saw relevant information at first. Many men in the Song Dynasty liked to put on makeup and behave in a effeminate manner.

At that time, the wind of ease and enjoyment was so strong that even the sound of the enemy's horse hooves still echoed in my ears. Those who should play with men played with men, and those who should play with women played with women. They didn't care at all.

It has become a trend for men to put on makeup and makeup to view their femininity as beautiful.

I think this world style is a bit weird, because the Song Dynasty has been in crisis since the founding of the country. Why is it so calm and...unsightly?

Later, after carefully reading a lot of information, I discovered that the so-called crisis had nothing to do with the scholar-bureaucrat class. They were just dancing and having fun.

This is a gesture of escape, and men will look for excuses once they escape.

And the best excuse is weakness.

And there is nothing weaker than a woman.

Then I was surprised to find that during the Jin Dynasty, the middle and late Tang Dynasty, the middle and late Song Dynasty... and even the middle and late Ming Dynasty, we could see a shift towards the feminization of men.

Men regard femininity as their beauty, take pride in being charming, and aim at femininity...

Then it was the setting sun of the empire: in the Jin Dynasty, the Han Dynasty was reduced to a two-legged sheep; in the Tang Dynasty, it collapsed at its peak; in the Song Dynasty, the warriors were reduced to a bandit army; in the Ming Dynasty... I don’t want to say this... and then... nothing Then.

The information I consulted must be very one-sided, but I just wrote it easily. It was a very smooth chapter, and it was completed in one go. It was very smooth, without any entanglements, and I didn’t think too much about anything...

It’s not a map cannon, nor is it borrowing from the past to describe the present, because I am not a public intellectual, and I don’t have the leisure to do so. A book friend said that I don't understand history. I sincerely accept the criticism, but the book review will be deleted, and I firmly refuse to admit that it is a map cannon.

Hereby declare!