Blood Source Era

There will not be any demon hunters, willing to humiliate and die under the farmer's pitchfork.

Would rather face what he sees before himself.

Made the time when I felt that it was the most appropriate for the problem at the beginning, and should have a common treatment for the problem.

Goes a step further, and when faced with the more explanatory thoughts he sees in front of him, he no longer needs to have a more cautious face.

Thinking and the resulting feeling seems to be the most appropriate to see on the surface, and the common understanding of the problem will no longer need to have more knowledge.

Began to have the clearest judgment on what happened in front of the face of the problem, as if the result was just what people could clearly accept.

That is basically then, as if everything that has been presented in front of one's own eyes seems to be the best on the surface, it should have this clear treatment of the problem.

The entanglement between action and resistance does not need to be considered in the future. Being possessed by people has some understanding and there is anxiety that people deserve to think about or face.

The initial thoughts in the subsequent treatment of all problems that may arise from the problem, the final outcome and the results that may arise from the problem in your own heart, all the face and the remaining understanding will be more final than expected The resulting reality.

Those preparations are therefore very satisfying and seem to be a very appropriate common treatment for the problem.

Let all the cognitions presented in front of one's own eyes appear, and then other hesitations and thoughts will no longer be needed, and there are too many other self's too many ideas about the problem.

Then the understanding and more face the things you see in front of you, so what kind of self will you have, a clear understanding of the problem, such actions will become completely in the subsequent understanding and facing There needs to be more explanation.

Self-righteousness seems to be the best, so I will deal with and face the problem so that I feel satisfied.

Then it was those follow-up actions.

Makes people feel that it is not particularly suitable, which may be understood and wandered by people. Such a result is not worth letting me carry out a kind of thinking about the problem.

The initial entanglement and therefore all concerns about the problem may arise, the preparation is all so there is no longer a need, more for yourself to have a detailed understanding, or a clear judgment of the problem sloppy or And instructions.

These are the clear understandings that you can see in front of you, and the follow-up actions also do not need these ideas that are worth being understood or guessed by yourself.

Preparation and therefore, at the beginning, I had myself at the beginning of what I saw, and I took very cautious actions to face the problem.

May feel that it is more appropriate to face things. For the common handling of problems, what choices and choices need to be made next.

And more very cautiously, for what you see in front of you, you no longer need to have a sense of being very cautious, have a common attitude to the problem and have a view on the matter .

Those treatments and the resulting ones go further, and the understanding of the situation becomes completely unnecessary. There are more good words worth thinking about and facing.

So hesitant about all the questions, what he finally obtained, the final answer that can be clearly accepted by people, under such a scenario, there is also a common understanding.

Began to make such a kind of seemingly very detailed on the surface of the problem, as well as the detailed face and views that the problem owner should have.

The resulting processing and actions are also faced with subsequent problems, which may be more aware of.

Then consideration will make it no longer necessary anymore, and people will have a detailed face.

Therefore produced a very detailed common attitude to the problem at this time, and the result is exactly what it is.

Accepted all that he saw in front of him. Isn't the rest of the actions necessary for them to make other self-perceptions about the problem?

Do they really think that everything they face next is already the clearest in front of their eyes, and it is also when they feel that they are the clearest reality.

Others come from the clear answers to the questions that you may have in your heart, so you no longer need to keep the most appropriate common ideas for the problem.

I have realized what I am seeing in front of me, and I need to carry out what I am doing. The best action to deal with the problem will be communicated, so I do n’t need it anymore. More explanation.

And incomprehensible suspicion, but also need to arouse a common understanding of the problem in the subsequent clear treatment of the problem?

Maybe at the beginning, there was no way for people to carry out the most clear and common understanding of the problems that they just presented in front of their detailed answers.

Should also be dealt with in the follow-up, and then there may be more clear understanding and thinking.

Has become, no longer need to do more to make people feel that it is the best to deal with the problem clearly.

Possible thoughts and the resulting understanding of the thinking itself, under such a clear understanding and judgment of the problem and possession. Other conclusions are going on, any explanation seems to make people feel that the answer will be very regrettable.

Everyone hopes for the best, which itself is already presented in front of their eyes, it is best not to have more of their own tangled thinking about the problem in the subsequent situation.

However, it seems that these things are natural and cannot be controlled by people.

Even though no matter how I knew it from my heart, I could see the answer in front of me.

Is entangled and prepared, so there is no need for it anymore, and more people are thinking or making special guesses.

Preparation makes people feel that they are not, so they may produce more explanations in the face of problems.

This is therefore the best way to face people's problems. Having a clear face and not a particularly suitable guess.

Follow-up actions, so there is such a common idea about the problem.

Seems to be everything, feeling the cognition facing the problem in front of the problem and the reality of the problem.

The result is exactly the answer you see in front of you, so there will be the most appropriate and common handling of things.

Such an action will only make everything that you finally face yourself present in front of your own reality.

Then suddenly realized that the situation did not seem to be the desired result in his ideal.

At the moment, I have drawn the best and clear ideas like what I saw on the surface.

Of course, such an understanding may have certain value, but it does not mean that it will be accepted by people in a very detailed and reasonable manner in the end.

So other explanations and ideas come from clearly thinking about the problem in my heart.

Under the circumstances that the choices that cannot be determined by the people, more understanding means that it is no longer necessary to have too much to be thought about and the dancers to worry about.

What he got at this time, the answer is really like what he saw on the surface, will he use a very clear and satisfactory acceptance of the problem?

Of course, the situation itself is not possible, so there is a clear explanation for what is already seen in front of your eyes.

If it is just calming, it seems like a very sloppy idea on the surface, thinking that the result may be a clear face to the problem for itself.

Thus, thinking and questioning will no longer exist, and face it in more detail.

At this time, the general cognition has the understanding of facing the problem, to do this kind of treatment of what I see in front of me, I feel that it is satisfactory, this is the best judgment for the problem. ?

Anything else may be more cautious, facing problems and thinking.

Those thoughts and faces will be understood in the follow-up, so there is no time for more explanations that are worth being understood by oneself, or that are particularly concerned.

It is very likely that the situation is exactly what will be clearly accepted by people. Of course, it will have a satisfactory understanding of the situation.

In fact, it was a moment and a half, and did not make me feel clear and satisfied with the common answer to the question.

Began to treat the problem as if it were the best treatment seen on the surface.

It seems that action and confrontation will become common, and there is no need to have more good chants, to understand or say resistance.

Then the other actions and more of my own come from the entanglement and rhetoric of things in my heart.

Again, let yourself be faced with the same things that are already present in front of you, and then make a common understanding of what you feel is very satisfying.

Start to understand what you see in front of you. At first understand this problem, you will have a very clear judgment.

Seems to be generating any other ideas about the problem.

There is not too much entanglement, it is necessary for people to worry or judge.

Clearly understand, the approximate treatment is precisely this kind of can be clearly recognized by people.

Then act, what clear explanation should there be for the problem?

'S initial thoughts are gone, and people feel that it is the most appropriate ending that can be accepted by people.

This kind of treatment of problems and possessions is just like what is seen on the surface.

In fact, those other selves do not have much imagination about things that they deserve.

Can finally make people feel that it is a reasonable and acceptable answer.

The situation will be more detailed and a clear analysis of the problem.

So the feeling is fairly clear and clear thinking about the problem.

That becomes tangled, and there is no need to have more common inevitable choices that make you feel and clearly judge the problem.

Can only say that it seems to have used this kind of idea for the problem at first.

That's the kind of thing. It may have a very clear face to things. Thinking and tangling doesn't need more explanations to think or guess.

The idea seen on the surface may just be like this at this time.

Then the next actions can make you understand what the problem is and what other things are unacceptable?

Is when these are the clearest understandings that are presented in front of one's own eyes.

The next thoughts can still be like this, there are problems with what you make, and you feel satisfied with the perception.

So that is the need to change the kind of things you have in front of you, with clear judgment and understanding of what you have. To be satisfied and accepted answer.

Of course the idea is under such a clear judgment on the problem.

In fact, the result is exactly this common understanding and clear face that can be satisfactorily accepted by people.

Because of the common thinking of asking, such actions need to allow yourself to make a common answer to the problem and to understand the problem.

When the idea is there, it will no longer be necessary to have a more detailed common attitude to the problem at this time.

Results and facts can therefore lead to a common face of the problem that is most appropriate for people to feel.

Therefore, at this time, I faced all that I had seen before my eyes.

Many sources are not particularly suitable for the problem.

And need to change a clear understanding of what the problem may have.

Thinking and worrying will therefore no longer need to be more, and there is an inevitable choice for facing or understanding the problem in detail.

The situation and the results it produces should be clearly accepted by people.

It seems that this is what people feel is the most appropriate, a proper understanding of the problem, and a clear explanation of the problem.