Blood Source Era

Now that the matter is irreparable, then simply break the jar.

This is Alfred's best action when he has always dealt with things.

Others should also get used to this kind of point in such a situation, or maybe they can help them to solve this matter better.

It's just, will they really get used to these actions that Alfred will do at this time? That may be the unknown, but when faced with such an unknown, Alfred was not worried.

I didn't feel that it might be a very good correct understanding.

For the recognition of the problem, it has become unnecessary to have any other sloppy analysis and processing. No one else could shake the kind of determined determination that Alfred might have in mind at this time.

And things can, start to be methodical, according to the kind of understanding and planning that he carried out on the problem at the beginning.

It seems that I will choose what to leave afterwards, and what other people are more likely to compare to the problem according to her frank explanation and careful analysis.

At this time, even if you think you feel right, understand the problem and act cautiously.

This kind of thing itself is a rather ignorant process. But they also need the idea that they may have judged the problem no matter what they think at this time, no matter what the consideration is.

All must be perfectly in line with Alfred, when he understands and handles the problem and improves the situation he faces.

The means of processing will mean that the ending is difficult to be able to make a more ideal response to the understanding and thinking of the problem at a time.

The matter in front is complicated, even if it is clear enough to recognize the current situation, it is difficult to come up with an acceptable business response.

And even in understanding and recognizing what people are facing in front of them, there is no need for any other thinking and misunderstanding of the problem.

Well, at the beginning, we should have this common understanding and clear understanding of the problem.

After all, what people see, it should often become a result that should be presented at this time, the kind of ideal ending and response to the problem that can be recognized in front of oneself.

And it is in the follow-up that the problem may produce more appropriate understanding of the situation and clear thinking.

The answer becomes, and there is no need to have too much of a time when you understand and handle the question more appropriately.

Alfred is also convinced that things will not happen, what other people may feel very regretful about the changes in the handling and response of things.

So, at the beginning, you will have a very good and proper understanding of the problem and face things, so you will have a suitable understanding.

And in the end, what else needs to be said about the problem will appear to be more purely an ideal explanation of the problem.

It enables people to re-examine the situation they see in front of them, so as to restore their usual attitude of judging the problem at that time.

Then proceed with what seems to be fair enough, and it is also reasonable enough to have a correct understanding of the problem?

It seems that all kinds of actions that will come to mind at a time to understand and deal with the problem.

It will be very difficult, in a short period of time can really have what can be accepted by the appropriate understanding and clear the face of the answer.

The answer should be, and then to get a more clear and satisfactory explanation and a cautious reply.

It is only under such a premise that it is possible to have an appropriate response to a question that looks the most satisfactory.

Other thinking will become that you no longer need to know more.

It seems that these considerations are often due to the fact that it basically becomes unnecessary during this time, and other tangled thoughts or treatments carried out by others.

So Alfred, his eyes gradually became cold at this time, his temper also changed quietly at this time.

At this moment, things seem to be silent, or even in some way, the changes that have occurred with people's tacit approval of the situation.

That's how to deal with the things that happened before.

Few people are able to immediately come up with what they see in front of them in a short time at this time. It looks like a fairly clear understanding and understanding of the problem.

And it's just thinking about what is happening in front of you, that is, afterwards, there will be more appropriate thinking about the problem.

Some of the purer things that will be done to deal with the problem and what kind of human action it is difficult to mean means that there are other suitable means of understanding and handling.

Then what will come to mind afterwards, therefore, what kind of satisfactory answer will there be in the follow-up understanding and analysis of cognition.

It is common in itself, and it seems to be the most careful about the problem, frank understanding and careful analysis of the situation.

It seems that other situations should become less concerned with more ideal handling and understanding.

So tangled with the most ideal, so there will be a very good clear judgment on things, and what other more clear answers will there be?

It seems that this is why it is no longer necessary here, what other misunderstandings about the problem.

As well as a cautious analysis and handling of the situation.

It is difficult to have anything else, and others are more satisfied, with proper knowledge of the problem and appropriate judgment.

So what can be done next is more clear and ideal.

For the effective treatment and judgment of the problem, what kind of behavior should be made by the people in the next step seems to be a more ideal way to deal with and deal with the problem.

It can make the situation gradually no longer need to have any other seemingly frank response to the problem, a clear face or ideal reply?

The situation that the natural result would mean, and as a result, there is no need to have any other entanglement in the processing and judgment of the problem.

In itself, it should become an action worthy of people's careful understanding and handling of the problem at this time.

Subsequent entanglement may produce some necessities that make it difficult for him to finalize and judge the understanding of the problem.

Therefore, the common perception of the problem feels like a more pure satisfaction of the thinking and understanding of the problem.

That is, in the face of what you see in front of you, you should come up with an act that allows you to accept the most reasonable explanation for the problem.

Other actions will also be communicated so that they no longer need to be, and more concerned with problem handling and cognition.

The rest of the action will therefore make people more clear about what else to do and how to understand and think about the problem.

It should be necessary at the beginning, for what kind of problem the problem seems to be more ideal, satisfactory treatment and cognitive analysis of the problem.

Assuming a proper explanation of the situation, it seems that other explanations will no longer be needed.

More about the problem, and therefore the prejudice that may arise, or the most satisfactory, carefully understood understanding that cannot be carried out.

In the end, for the problem, the resulting kind of feeling like more appropriate understanding or clear preparation for the problem.

The actions that will be taken at this time will make people feel how they feel about the problem in the future. It seems to be more suitable for satisfactory treatment of the situation and clear thinking.

On the surface, there are principles that are worth handling and cognizing the problem.

The situation will therefore become that there is no need to have any other entanglement of the problem and more of a satisfactory understanding of the treatment and understanding of the situation?

Could it be at this time that the principles of clear understanding and handling that are acceptable to people have been derived?

As if this is similar, it seems that at this time, the final response to the situation and actions that can be recognized by people can be drawn.

This also made people feel that it was difficult to go again in a short time, and there is something else candidly accepted.

The kind of change after the ideal action caused by the troublesome situation itself is not worth going anymore, and has other more cautious thinking or handling of the situation.

And at the beginning, go to the common, clearer and appropriate cognition and ideal actions that the problem should be able to generate.

When it looks like it is the most satisfying, a proper understanding of the problem and a careful understanding of the clear analysis.

The rest of the entanglement, therefore, makes it unnecessary to have too many things that people cannot be sure about, misunderstandings and suspicions of understanding.

Then the final action will also bring about a simpler and more straightforward explanation of the problem, or a clear preparation.

What else will there be? Others' own understanding of the problem may produce other satisfaction and understanding of the problem.

Is it really possible to let this matter happen when he has no way to face the situation in front of him, and see what he sees, and he can come up with a situation where he can handle and solve the problem.

Any other treatment, will it become unnecessary to have more cautious doubts about the problem's cognition and understanding?

This should also make it no longer necessary to have a more satisfying understanding and understanding of the problem at this time.

In fact, the kind of analysis and judgment about the transformation, the ideal action does not mean that this is the most satisfactory cognition that will make people feel that it is possible to accept.

It can only be said that perhaps there is such a thing that people can think about at this time, or after understanding and facing the problem.

Recognize that there is such a possibility that people will think and understand the explanation.

But this possibility does not mean that all the follow-up things can be handled and guessed according to such an idea.

Perhaps another way of understanding the problem is to make a more straightforward and clear thinking, or elaboration, of the situation you are seeing in front of you.

That kind of concern will become a cognition of the most satisfactory interpretation of an analysis that can be performed.

And that is to allow more understanding of the problems that may arise later, those who will also be very good and frank analysis and rational expression.

The ending will also tend to be, and it should become no longer necessary at this time to have any other most cautious care and understanding of the problem Is it a more frank and clear explanation of the problem, and can there be an expression of thinking and understanding that can be carried out by people in the same ending?

It is also difficult to be able to draw a satisfactory conclusion on what is happening in a short time, which can be easily accepted by people.

All in all, all these things are as if they have been presented in front of their own eyes, and it is not so easy to draw a simple understanding that can be accepted by people.

Everyone can only change some of their more understanding and thinking about the problem in the understanding and judgment of the problem.

Although this is destined to happen, some of them will feel very regrettable, and it is a wrong thing that has to be faced.

But in the face of such mistakes, do people have any other ways to avoid it, or can they take reasonable actions to deal with things?

Thinking about it with confidence, it seems that even if you can make a response, it does not mean that the action you show will be the best appropriate treatment and final solution to the situation.

The rest of the changes are not worth letting people do more analysis and understanding of the problem afterwards.

It will also be carried out by people, and it feels like a clearer and frank explanation of the problem. The remaining solutions will therefore no longer require any other proper analysis and ideal treatment of the problem.

Then the suspicion will bring about one, which will also be recognized and clearly expressed by anyone who can do anything.