Conan: The winner is justice

Yaoshou, the two-shift beast actually asked for a monthly ticket!

In fact, I will just open a single chapter and give it a try.

From the time I opened the book to now, I have never asked for anything other than subscriptions, including recommendation tickets, monthly passes, etc. I have always said thank you to readers for their recommendation votes and monthly passes.

If you don’t update some books and write a chapter in two or three days, readers will still vote. Some books have better grades than me, more books than me, and monthly tickets are lower than me. Of course, it is also possible that he wrote too long and read less. So these things are actually quite imaginary. It all depends on reader preference.

Just on a whim, I wanted to see if any readers would vote for me. (funny)

As of now, I have summarized the readers’ questions.

There are two main issues. The first one is the timeline I wrote earlier. I explained a lot to readers before. But now that I look back on myself, I can’t help but sigh. Sure enough, there is an old saying that goes, those who are in authority are obsessed with it.

I was in a high mood for writing at that time, and it was easy for me to get into a state of self-excitement, the kind of state where I couldn't wait to pour out the inspiration in my heart. It is easy to enter this state when writing, because writing a book is a matter full of sensibility. It is not just a matter of moving your fingers. Without sensibility, it is impossible to give emotions to the characters in the book.

Self-pleasure is not terrible, but if there is enough foreshadowing, then it is logical. The correct approach is to wait for hundreds of thousands of words and have enough foreshadowing before writing. This way the sense of fragmentation won't be too severe.

There is also a question about the characters in the book.

Collecting all readers’ opinions on my character description, it’s no surprise that this is the case.

My depictions of characters are extreme.

For example, "Although Kudo Shinichi is not great, he is not like this." Such comments.

All those who say characters are poisonous are based on my writing technique.

Why I write this is because this is the kingly way of writing online articles. All character settings must be written around the protagonist's position. Note that this is the protagonist's position. Whether it’s fan fiction or original work, it has to be written this way.

Since Kudo Shinichi is the clear opposite of the protagonist, do I need to describe his good qualities? Am I going to describe how excellent his reasoning is? Do you need to describe his calm, witty and courageous side?

No, because he is the opposite of the protagonist and I just need to make the readers hate him.

So some people say that if I ask the protagonist to step on this and that, and if he doesn’t step on anything, he won’t be able to write... I’m sorry, but the author’s description of the characters in the book depends on the protagonist’s perspective.

In the same way, Xiao Ai is the protagonist's friend, so do I need to describe her annoying side? Of course not, I should try my best to make readers like her. So I actually added some more settings to this character at the beginning, such as the setting of "Doraemon". For example, she can recite laws proficiently from the beginning. These all-round attributes are all to prevent readers from rejecting this "friend". "Fang character" was written.

Including the following, if there is a black character who becomes an ally of the protagonist, then I will not specifically describe the unpleasant aspects of this character, nor will I write about the aspects that may deceive the protagonist. I will only try to write so that readers will like it. place for this character.

And if there is a character who becomes the antagonist of the protagonist, even if it is Akai Amuro (just an analogy), it will be the same.

Whatever this character's stance towards the protagonist is, I will describe him in a corresponding way. It’s not that I particularly love or hate a certain character, it’s just that I would write about the protagonist’s perspective.

Because my writing style highlights the characteristics of the characters, especially the antagonists of the protagonists, and because I don’t write or write less about the strengths of these characters, it looks extreme.

But this is the kingly way of writing. Those who describe "respectable opponents" are actually very unsuitable for the genre of online writing.

Of course, this kind of writing can easily bring trouble to the author.

Especially for fans, some readers read the book with their own opinions on the original characters. They don't care what the protagonist's position is, they just think that a certain character should be black or white.

All I can say is that I wrote the characters according to the popular writing method of online articles.

In fact, if you look at those popular Conan fans, as long as they have achieved some achievements, there are few who will not disappoint Kudo Shinichi, such as Coroner and the like. There is a basic logic in Internet articles. If you don’t step on it, you can’t highlight the protagonist.

Writing books and reading books are really two different concepts. I have learned a lot before and suffered a lot. It's all blood and tears.

I really can't satisfy everyone, I can only satisfy some people.

Poisonous or not, in fact, the biggest problem with online articles is that they are blandly written.

As the saying goes, the biggest poisonous point is that the article is mediocre.

Although I seem to have done very well in this book - just kidding, it is much better than what I used to do, but what I wrote is not easy either. The most difficult thing is the protagonist. I often get confused because of what the protagonist should say. In a word, I stopped and thought for a long time about how to say it.

How difficult was this character to write?

Li Gou Hai is a TV series in 2010, and it is now 2023. How many years have passed?

I don’t believe that no one has written about my subject before, or tried to think about it. But why is it that no one writes it, and it’s my turn as a newcomer to write it? (This account is purely new, there is no popular book opener)

In the past, many people said that I was taking advantage of the popularity and that I failed to write the character Gu Meimen well. But I just want to ask them, have you ever thought about my above question?

No one was writing the drama in 2010, so it was my turn to write it. It can only be difficult to write, not easy to write, right?

I don’t dare to say how good the protagonist I wrote is, but at least I carefully shaped him and didn’t write randomly.

The characters are the main thing, and then there’s the plot. There needs to be a script that’s understandable, right? Should you consider inverting elements? There should be highlights in court debates, right?

How much energy I spent, only the author knows how difficult it is.

I pay great attention to reviews. In the past, whenever there was a reviewer venting his emotions towards the author, I would feel uncomfortable and ban him at the same time (funny). But now I am too lazy to read book reviews. I only read this chapter to follow up, and only this chapter That's the truest thing to say.

I'm trying to conceive of the story I want to write, and I hope readers can understand the author and accept the author's story.

I posted this late at night, sorry.