Crossover in the Anime World

The latest website: The confrontation between Superman and Luthor will never end, because Superman represents the acme of being a citizen, enough to break the rules of the game for nobles. Under such circumstances, Luther must do whatever it takes to kill Superman.

In the DC universe, some of the results of the confrontation between Superman and Luthor are reflected, one is the lord Superman, towards the monarchy. One is an unrighteous superman who becomes a tyrant. One is to send Luthor to prison and continue to maintain the original balance.

The nobles were also helpless in the face of the strong who came out of the citizens.

In fact, all civilizations start out as nobles, citizens, and free folk. It is called differently, and it can also be aristocrat, countryman, or savage.

Such as island countries, nobles, warriors, and free people. But in the end, the samurai came to power, and the samurai replaced the nobles as the actual managers of the country, that is, the samurai were on top and the nobles were on the bottom, forming Bushido. Nobles have to abide by Bushido if they want to join the game.

Of course, no matter what the situation is, it will eventually enter the feudal system.

The feudal system is to allow free people the opportunity to become citizens, because as long as the citizens are enfeoffed, they will become nobles, so he also needs his own citizens, so he will naturally choose some of them from the free people.

Before enfeoffment, there was only one line for nobles, citizens, and free folk. After enfeoffment, it was divided into several lines, with multiple nobles, multiple citizens, and free people.

After enfeoffment, the new aristocrats can take the freedmen to fight and upgrade the freedmen to become citizens.

This is also the reason why Rome quickly entered the era of giants after the Marian reforms in Rome, because more citizens will emerge from various places, and the nobles have mastered the newly emerging citizens and power, and began to become princes.

For example, in the Yin and Shang era, only Yin merchants were citizens, and princes and barbarians were free citizens. In the Zhou Dynasty, the Zhou people and the princes were all citizens, and the barbarians were free people. These newly emerged citizens were not in the hands of Zhou Tianzi, but in the hands of various princes, and finally the power of the princes surpassed the emperor.

Such a feudal system is very conducive to expansion, because citizens all want to make meritorious service and become princes, and free people also hope to become citizens through war.

Therefore, both the Zhou Dynasty and ancient Rome expanded during the enfeoffment system.

But once there is no way to expand, the nobles, citizens, and free people will not change, which reflects the ability of the king. How does the king do it, whether to suppress the citizens and the free people with the nobles, or win over the nobles and citizens against the free people, or win over the citizens and the free people against the nobles.

The Shangyang Reform of the Qin Dynasty was to mobilize citizens and free people to fight against the nobles, but it also needed expansion. In the Han Dynasty, the king and the nobles cooperated to win over citizens. In the Song Dynasty, the imperial examination allowed the citizens to disperse the nobles, and then the king continued to win over the free people. In the Qing Dynasty, slavery was completely eliminated, and everyone became a good citizen, and the impact was further intensified.

In other countries, the king did not have this ability at all. The nobles of ancient Rome cooperated with the citizens and did not give the king face. The island country also cooperates with samurai and nobles, and does not give the emperor face.

The tsar wanted to win over the free people, and even became a "farmer's father", but he would never treat him. The nobility quickly gained industrial power, and the Tsar could not stop it.

It is a very difficult step for enfeoffment to move towards the monarchy. Many countries have kings, but the kings cannot mobilize the middle and lower classes at all. Therefore, the feudal system can only be maintained, and there is a group of princes, and each prince has citizens and free people in his hands.

There is no need for princes to integrate citizens and free people, and integration is not good for him. The legitimacy of the princes is to give benefits to the citizens, and then the citizens can defend the princes.

Just like in "Cao GUI's Controversy", Cao GUI said that meat eaters are despicable, and asked the king of Lu why he wanted to fight? The monarch said that he had good food and drink and did not dare to enjoy it alone, so he gave it to others. I am very punctual every time I sacrifice. Finally, let's talk about large and small cases, although we cannot clearly understand them one by one, they must be judged in good faith.

Cao GUI said that if the princes have delicious food, they can only share it with those around them, and those who can't get food will not help, and no matter how timely the sacrifice is, the gods will not appear. Only the last large and small cases are judged in good faith, which can be supported by the people of the country.

If the monarch has a bad attitude towards the citizens, is not sincere enough, and cannot ensure the interests of the citizens, then the citizens will not support the monarch.

It can be said that every country is similar at the beginning, whether it is nobles, citizens, free people, or nobles, countrymen, and savages are very similar.

Later, the role of the king made each country different. In many countries, religion can represent all people, and everyone is equal before God. In the Central Plains, everyone is equal in front of the emperor. In the whole world, is it the king who leads the land? The emperor represents everyone. With this qualification, the emperor can continue to mobilize the middle and lower classes, step by step from the common master to the monarch Step by step, the nobles' land rights, talent rights, and part of the economic rights are concentrated in their own hands.

But even Junfu couldn't manage such a big country by himself, so the emperor set up a sophisticated management system, but in the end the management system was established, and Junfu had to integrate himself into it and become a part of the machine .

The emperors of the Ming Dynasty controlled the management system through monitoring agencies such as Jinyiwei and Dongchang, while the emperors of the Qing Dynasty integrated into the system and cultivated their own factions, which formed the dispute between Manchu and Han.

Therefore, the emperors of the Ming Dynasty did not go to court, while the emperors of the Qing Dynasty worked every day. In fact, the fact that the emperors of the Ming Dynasty did not go to court does not mean that they did not do things. They spent their time on Jinyiwei and Dongchang. The emperor of the Qing Dynasty worked every day, and most of the time he just looked at the posters sent by his own faction to see if there was any situation in various places, and most of the time he just looked at the memorials that were not nutritious.

To sum up, the feudal system is easy to use when expanding. The nobleman is willing to let more free people become citizens through expansion, and then he wins over the citizens to form a powerful force against the king.

And when there is no expansion, a king who can mobilize the middle and lower classes is one in a million, and many people want to do it but can't do it. Without the support of the system and culture, it is difficult for the king alone to fight against all the nobles.

Western kings are looking for religion and consolidating their status through the divine right of kings, but their explorations in systems and culture are still standing still. The king of the Central Plains is constantly exploring the content of the system and culture, and constantly looking for the power to mobilize the middle and lower classes.

If the king of the Central Plains does not make progress, it will be "Your Majesty will rule the world with the scholar-bureaucrats, not with the people." In order to suppress the scholar-bureaucrats, he must constantly recruit new talents, otherwise he will be manipulated by the scholar-bureaucrats.

However, although the king selects middle- and lower-level talents, there is one problem that the king cannot solve, that is, whether to protect the royal power or the dynasty, whether his own throne is important or the country is important. A lot of times it's about choosing your own throne.

Just like Temujin, UU reading www.uukanshu. Com knows that his son can fight, but he can't continue to let his son fight because his son has threatened himself.

The same is true for the king. He knows that a certain minister is more capable than himself and can solve the problem, but the king cannot let him solve it, because if he solves it, the minister's reputation will be higher than his own, and the throne will be lost. But if the problem is not solved, the dynasty will not be guaranteed.

So in the end the king was overthrown, so that the entire management system was consistent with the interests of the country, and there was room for ministers who were able to solve problems without being restricted by the king.

From Superman, we can see the differences between East and West, and the history of Westerners. Superman is a super citizen, a person who can break the rules, and what will a citizen do if he has the ability? Superman's works give different answers, that is, none of them mobilize the middle and lower classes.

Whether it is becoming a monarch, becoming a tyrant, or maintaining order, they all exist in Western history.

In fact, Superman can also expand, and then implement the enfeoffment system. Or mobilize middle and lower-level talents to represent everyone. In this case, this should be the superman of the co-lord, the superman of the father, or the superman of feudalism and the superman of the emperor.

Mobile phone users please browse and read, palm reading is more convenient.