From University Lecturer to Chief Academician

The annihilation energy non-conservation experiment released by the Antigravity Behavior Research Center, as well as the research done by Wang Hao and his team, overturned the already deeply rooted theory of the big bang, caused a big shock in the international physics community, and triggered many Discussion and controversy.

Relevant news will naturally attract a lot of attention, such as the news that Wang Hao was interviewed.

Wang Hao just expressed his personal opinion on the problem, but every sentence, even every word he said was carefully analyzed by the media.

In some large-scale media reports, they deeply analyzed and summarized what Wang Hao said, "Professor Wang Hao's organization is very clear. He mentioned three issues respectively, research stage, personal understanding and future. Target."

"Professor Wang Hao believes that the research has just entered the initial stage, and more experiments are needed in the follow-up to draw more conclusions. The research is very exploratory."

"His understanding of space can be described in one sentence. Space is the guide of matter. This is very similar to Novotini's understanding. It is under the background of the universe with enhanced annihilation force that existing particles and matter will appear. , energy, and so on."

"Finally, Professor Wang Hao believes that the next goal of the annihilation theory is to realize the unification of physics and establish a complete theoretical system..."

Stages, understanding, goals...

The media analyzed Wang Hao's words thoroughly, which also allowed more people to have a clear understanding of the research.

Many scholars have expressed their views on the research. They believe that the new research has subverted the big bang theory and created a new theory around the annihilation force of space.

That is a brand-new framework for the development of the universe, which can explain many astronomical phenomena.

Novotini of the International Annihilation Theory Organization spoke highly of Wang Hao. He was interviewed again and made a personal evaluation, “Wang Hao and his team’s research, while overturning the Big Bang theory, also created a brand new The research direction, that is, the research direction of the new physical theory surrounding the annihilation force in space."

"This will be a revolutionary development of annihilation theory, which can be called the second revolution of theory."

"What is certain is that in the next few years or more than ten years, many theoretical physicists and astronomers will devote themselves to research related to annihilation force."

The so-called "theoretical revolution" refers to the fact that the influence of theories will become greater and will be more deeply rooted in the hearts of the people.

The annihilation theory has replaced string theory before and has become the first theory in the international physics community, but in fact, even if it replaces string theory, the scope of influence is very limited.

For example, the theory of annihilation cannot affect astrophysics research, and the two are not even related.

The only thing that is related is the basic theory of the annihilation theory - "Strong Annihilation Force", which is the research result of Helen and Chen Mengmeng. They analyzed the dark matter problem with the theory of strong annihilation force.

But in fact, the impact on astrophysics is still very small, after all, the research on dark matter has little impact.

It's different now.

Wang Hao's latest research involves the ubiquitous cosmic microwave radiation background, and analyzes the Big Bang theory in a new way, supported by experimental foundations, which naturally directly affects astrophysics.

Many astronomical phenomena that cannot be explained temporarily can be analyzed in connection with the annihilation theory.

In this way, many astrophysicists will definitely devote themselves to the study of annihilation theory.

Even if they don't do theoretical research, they must understand the theory of annihilation in order to be able to explain some astronomical phenomena and astrophysical content.

...

International Annihilation Theory Organization.

The news of Wang Hao's interview was released, which made Empoli Kubo very happy. What others saw was the influence of research, but Empoli Kubo focused on the "research stage".

In the internal meeting of the organization, Empoli-Cooper said, "Professor Wang Hao admitted that the research is still in the early stage, and we are very promising in many directions."

"What they disclosed was the annihilation energy non-conservation experiment, and this experiment..."

"We reproduced it easily."

"Of course, the technological gap must be admitted, but I think the gap is not as big as imagined, and we will definitely be able to catch up."

This statement has been recognized by many people.

Although there is a huge gap in the experimental data disclosed by the two parties, it is not necessarily how big the technical gap is. There is no direct evidence that the data gap represents a technical gap.

If we take the intensity of a strong annihilation force field as an example, maybe the intensity of '3' can annihilate 20% of the energy, while the intensity of '4' can annihilate 90% of the energy.

These are uncertain things.

Empoli Kubo's statement made Novotini silent, and he couldn't refute it without direct evidence. He could only think disdainfully in his heart, "Maybe Wang Hao's team has many experimental discoveries, but there is no public?"

"I can't believe anything, the technology gap is very small..."

Novotini guessed right.

When the international physics community was still immersed in the controversy over the non-conservation of annihilation energy, the brand-new expansion theory of the universe, and the existence of space, the Antigravity Behavior Research Center released sixteen experiments in one go.

The contents of these experiments were made public, which immediately aroused strong repercussions.

The journal "Nature-Physics" published nine papers on related experimental results, while the main issue of "Nature" published a three-page express report, summarizing the contents of sixteen experiments.

"The experimental content released by the Antigravity Behavior Research Center explains a series of characteristics of the strong annihilation force field, so that everyone can have a clear understanding of the strong annihilation force field."

"The specific experimental content mainly includes four parts."

"The first part is the general characteristics. The superposition characteristics of the strong annihilation force field are different from the anti-gravity field. The superposition of strong annihilation force fields of different strengths will be based on the field force with the highest strength."

"in addition……"

"The second part is the verification of the characteristics of the anti-gravity field. The Anti-gravity Behavior Research Center has produced a super-strong anti-gravity field with an intensity of more than 90%, and has conducted particle inertia experiments on its content, and compared the results. The analysis proves that the field force is close to 100%, and the influence on the speed of light is close to 48.6%.”

"This data corrects Professor Wang Hao's research. His research on the 2.5-dimensional topological structure of photons believes that the anti-gravity field is close to 100%, and the speed of light will be infinitely close to 50%."

"That's just a vague inference. Now we use experiments to measure and give more definite data."

"The third part is the effect of high-intensity magnetic fields on the directional deflection of strong annihilation force fields. There is only one experiment in this area, and the effect is not very obvious. It is certain that high-intensity magnetic fields can indeed have an effect on strong annihilation force fields."

"Professor Wang Hao's paper believes that this can be used to study the relationship between the annihilation force and the electromagnetic force, which is of great significance to the unification of physics."

"The fourth part is the most amazing!"

The newsletter report published by "Nature" magazine used more than one page to introduce the fourth part, because the experimental results are really amazing. "Professor Wang Hao and his team claimed that using the magnetization effect of a strong annihilation force field on matter, a Variation elements."

"Professor Wang Hui from the Materials Testing Center determined that they detected a brand new iron element in the magnetized residue."

"Its atomic structure is the same as that of iron, not an isotope of iron. At the same time, it has the same chemical properties as iron, but different physical properties."

"The discovery of this mutated element may become an opportunity for mankind to realize a new technological revolution..."

The final discovery is so important that it can be said to subvert human cognition of elements.

In the previous understanding of elements, the same atomic structure represents the same element, and the extranuclear electrons determine the characteristics of the element, but the same atomic structure will have the same extranuclear electrons.

The atomic structure of the mutated element discovered now is exactly the same as that of the iron element, and the chemical properties are also exactly the same. The only difference is the physical property it possesses.

What kind of element is this?

Could it be that the magnetization effect brought about by the strong annihilation force field can also change the physical properties of elements?

The results published in the "Nature" magazine once again aroused a lot of discussion. The news is not limited to the academic circle, and the public opinion is discussing related issues.

There are many scholars who stand up and hope that the Anti-Gravity Behavior Research Center can disclose more information about the mutated elements.

At the same time, there are also many voices of doubt, "Is the variable element just a brand new compound, just an error in the experimental measurement?"

"Variation elements do not match science!"

"How can the physical properties be different when the atomic structure is exactly the same?"

"Maybe it's just an isotope of iron?"

"..."

When public opinion was hotly debated, many scholars turned to the International Annihilation Theory Organization.

In addition to the anti-gravity form research center in the whole world, only the International Annihilation Theory Organization can create a strong annihilation force field.

If the two institutions make discoveries at the same time, it will naturally prove that the research is true. Otherwise, it will be difficult to make a judgment based on the results released by the Antigravity Behavior Research Center.

What if something goes wrong in the experiment?

There are also conspiracy theorists who believe that the Antigravity Behavior Research Center may deliberately release false information to guide a wrong research direction to mislead other research institutions.

The International Annihilation Theory Organization had to stand up.

Empoli-Cooper no longer had any excitement, but bit the bullet and accepted an interview with reporters, and said, "We will verify the experimental results released by the Antigravity Behavior Research Center."

In a word, nothing else.

The reason for Empoli-Cooper's displeasure is also very simple. He just said within the organization that he will conduct brand-new research and strive to catch up with the Antigravity Behavior Research Center in the short term.

result……

The other party released sixteen experiments in one breath, and each one seemed to be more important than the other.

Don't say anything about "discovering mutated elements from magnetization reaction residues", even the conventional characteristics of the strong annihilation force field cannot be verified, because they only have one device that can produce a strong annihilation force field, how can they create two fields to superimpose?

There is also a high-intensity anti-gravity field...

Isn't this a joke?

The highest intensity anti-gravity field they can create is less than 70%, and each experiment requires a high amount of funds, and the intensity of 90% is simply unthinkable.

That is a number that is doomed to be unattainable.

The effect of a high-intensity magnetic field on the directional deflection of a strong annihilation force field can be verified, but many people in the organization believe that this direction is the least cost-effective.

The manufacture of large-scale high-intensity magnetic fields requires a very high amount of funds. Even if the verification is done, the effect is not good. Investing in funds in the unit of "billion dollars" just to verify the effect of an experiment is obviously very worthwhile.

This one was directly PASSed.

The remaining issue is the most concerned variable element, and the direction of the experiment is also the clearest, which is to create a high-intensity strong annihilation force field.

But……

If a high-strength strong annihilation force field can be created, wouldn't all other problems be solved?

Empoli-Cooper and other scholars in the organization analyzed the results of each experiment, and finally found that they could only do the two simplest characteristic verifications, and the other experiments were either too high in investment, or the technology was not up to standard , cannot be verified at all.

Finally, Empoli-Kubo had an idea, "Can we use the results they released as a conclusion to do other research?"

He hopes to do new research in order to achieve catch-up in the research field, instead of spending a lot of money and time to verify the experimental results of competitors.

This idea was outright rejected.

Some scholars in the organization directly pointed out, "As the public opinion said, what if they deliberately release false news? All the research we do in the future may be misled because of this."

"We have to do verification, and we have to find a way to solve technical problems!"

Empoli Kubo knows that too.

In fact, when they discuss the direction of experiments, they not only need to consider the research itself, but also consider another issue-political correctness in the field of science.

The dominance in the field of frontier scientific exploration has always been held by the countries and institutions headed by American, and other countries and institutions are just catching up.

As the chasers, they can naturally use the conclusions, and they who have the initiative will only believe in their own research. Even if they know the gap with the anti-gravity behavior research center, most scholars only believe in their own experimental results.

This is political correctness in the field of cutting-edge science.

If they directly accept the experimental conclusions and use them to determine new research directions, they will definitely receive a lot of criticism, and many influential people outside the field will definitely express their concerns and dissatisfaction.

So, they have no choice.

Empoli-Cooper just felt a bit stuck. He hoped to determine a new direction in order to truly have his own research results, but he was forced to give up temporarily, and instead invested in the verification of the results released by competitors. at work.

However, their technology is not up to standard.

What to do?

"Maybe it's not half a year of catching up..."

Empoli Cooper thought bitterly, "Maybe it will be three years, four years, or even longer. First of all, we need to solve the technology gap, but how to solve it?"

The problem of technology gap will definitely not be solved for the time being.

Empoli Cooper thought of a way to deal with public opinion. It is impossible for him to publicly admit that many experiments cannot be verified. In an interview, he simply questioned and said, "Everyone is paying attention to variable elements, and some even said that it will become a revolution in materials science. -Life."

"But, so far, we haven't found anything."

"Maybe it's just an error in the experimental detection? Maybe, no one can be sure until there is no conclusive evidence."

"As for this issue, I personally reserve my opinion for the time being."

Cooper did not directly deny the mutated element, but his attitude has already explained everything. Coupled with some doubts and conspiracy theories in public opinion, more people have questioned the issue of mutated elements.

In this case, the pressure on the International Annihilation Theory Organization will naturally decrease.

the other side.

When Wang Hao noticed the issue of international public opinion, he just smiled lightly, and he didn't pay special attention to it at all.

At this stage, the main direction of the antigravity behavior research center is to study f-rays, and they also hope to increase the strength of the annihilation force field to create higher-intensity f-rays.

Only under the action of higher-intensity f-rays can more mutated elements be produced, not just the 'extremely weak' content in the magnetization reaction residue.

In fact, the mutated element is the bait deliberately thrown out by the Antigravity Behavior Research Center.

The news is of course true.

However, if you want to create variable elements, you need a higher intensity annihilation force field, and to create a higher intensity annihilation force field, you need a high-intensity spiral magnetic field environment.

These are all related research questions.

If the International Annihilation Theory Organization sets the direction of technological improvement as relying on superconducting materials or equipment foundations to continuously increase the superimposed force field to enhance the strong annihilation force field, it must be in the wrong direction.

"However, if you want to continue to increase the intensity of F-rays, in the final analysis, it still depends on the material!"

Wang Hao thought about it.

The technical problems of basic materials cannot be solved by research.

When Wang Hao was feeling emotional, he suddenly received a message from the Superconducting Materials Experimental Center.

They teamed up with the Material Testing Center to conduct superconducting tests on mutated iron elements, and found that mutated iron-based compounds have higher superconducting properties than conventional iron-based compounds.