I Have a Little Black Hole

Of course, Lei Tiantang has also noticed the limelight of the public opinion in the past two days. He also reads the news every day during meals and breaks, especially the news about the company, even if the company's publicity department is concerned about the public opinion. , but he still has to master the specific situation.

Therefore, he has no objection to Jiang Yuting and the company's executives wanting to hold a special meeting to discuss this issue. Although he himself thinks this matter is no big deal, the company's executives don't think so.

From a strategic level, these senior executives of the company are still looking at this issue from the perspective of ordinary people, so they feel that international law will bring trouble to the company.

But Lei Tiantang also knew that he couldn't blame them for this, because they didn't know what kind of trump cards he had that could make him calm about this matter, so he still came to the meeting to give them a clue.

So seeing them all turned their attention to himself, he smiled confidently and said: I have also paid attention to the news of the past two days, and there is no big problem with your response, but I don't think there is any problem with your worries. necessary!

Regarding the fact that they want to expand and refine the Moon Agreement in international law, I don't think everyone needs to interpret it excessively.

We all know that because this Moon Agreement involves issues closely related to the vital interests of all countries, such as the development, utilization and sharing of lunar resources, so although this agreement seems to have been widely recognized on the surface, but All countries have taken a cautious attitude. So far, very few countries have approved it. Major space countries such as the old and the United States and polar bears have not joined, nor has my country.

Which aerospace power is willing to join such an agreement to tie itself? And even if the old beauty and his younger brothers can quarrel to let more countries join such an agreement, what's the use?

After all, the Moon Agreement is nothing but an agreement. How much binding capacity can an agreement have? So even if Lao Mei and her younger brothers join this agreement, they are just tying a bundle of straw ropes around herself, and they can ignore it at any time!

Even if it is an integral part of international law, what is international law that is violated by the old and the United States and their little brother countries? Who really takes it seriously? That is to say, it is especially useful to use this thing to point fingers at some small countries that are not strong enough!

His words also made everyone in the conference room nod. They are all elites, and of course they understand this kind of thing clearly.

The reason why the old United States and other countries dare to blatantly violate international law is not because the binding force of international law on him is relatively low!

Take Lao Mei as an example. From the moment she made a fortune from war and became the world's leader, Lao Mei has always pursued hegemonism and the principle that Lao Mei's own national interests are paramount. What they generally agree with is national priority and power logic.

In 1999, NATO, led by the old and the United States, bypassed the United Nations, ignored international law and norms of international relations, and carried out air strikes on the Yugoslavia, causing heavy casualties, which was strongly condemned by world public opinion.

In 2018, the old US President Trump announced that they had joined England and France to carry out precision strikes on Syrian military installations.

This way of bypassing the United Nations and launching a direct military attack is undoubtedly a violation of international law, but not only the United States has done this, but England and France have also done it, while Greece and Cyprus have provided support for the strike.

There are many more military actions that show that international law is really a joke for these countries,

You can use it when you need it, and no one will take it seriously when you don't use it!

Therefore, under such circumstances, international law has nothing to do with the old and the United States. The United States ranks first in both economic and military strength. Therefore, under such circumstances, international law has no binding force on the old and the United States, and it is also because of the hegemony of the old and the United States.

A national security adviser of the United States once wrote an article claiming that in order to defend national interests, the United States does not need to abide by international law.

In fact, in today's world, it is not only old beauty, but also polar bears and some countries that do not talk about it. But for a considerable number of old beauties, the old American constitution is the real law that cannot be violated, and this is the foundation of the old beauties and their rule of law.

As Lei Tiantang said, in fact, international law is only an international agreement, commitment, and moral responsibility, but not the binding force of law. Therefore, when international law is beneficial to the old and American countries, it is useful, and when it is unfavorable, it is useless.

Lawyers for the U.S. Department of Justice said in a key memo in the aftermath of 9/11 that the president and the U.S. military do not have to abide by any international law on prisoners of war in the war on terror.

The memorandum makes clear that any international law, including the laws of war that should generally be observed, is not binding on the United States, because these international laws have no legal status in the federal law of the United States.

Therefore, the old American approach is that if international law is beneficial to the interests of the old United States, then the old United States will use the international law as the banner, and if the international law is detrimental to the old American interests, then no matter how correct the international law is, the old American will ignore it.

In fact, it is not only the old and the United States that do not abide by international law, but there are also at least a few notorious examples in the Baga country, such as whaling, trying to change the conclusion of World War II, and the Okinotori Reef issue. These are typical cases of major powers ignoring international law.

Seeing that everyone agreed with his statement, Lei Tiantang continued the topic.

So in the final analysis, if you have the strength, you can ignore this thing! We can also ignore the things that old beauty can ignore!

What we have to abide by is the law that our country and other countries have agreed upon and that everyone abides by. We also maintain such a legal order, but the Moon Agreement that they have hyped up to strengthen is obviously aimed at us. Unjust laws, such 'laws' are for us to ignore!

And the reason why I came to hold this meeting with you this time to discuss this issue is that I want to formally give you the bottom line again, that is, our Infinite Gravity Group also has the strength to ignore such so-called 'laws that are unfavorable to us. '!

I can't tell you the detailed trump cards, but if I tell you from the side, you will know this to some extent, that is, the trump cards I have are no worse than any big country!