full-time artist

Everyone seems to see the back of the lonely walking in the snow, thinking while walking...

In fact, readers who have read "Roger's Mystery" know very well how proud and principled Poirot is.

Everyone is used to Poirot's wisdom and judgment!

Getting him to say "I can't judge" is incredible.

Like he ended up getting out of the case.

Because it is incredible, readers can empathize with Poirot's torment and choice!

At this moment, Poirot has become a great detective recognized by countless people!

You should know that "the world-famous great detective" is the setting given to Poirot by the author of the novel.

The author's pen can be freely set in the novel, such as the most handsome man in the world, the most beautiful woman in the world, etc.

Third-rate writers set their own self-obscenity.

Top-notch writers, as soon as the story and setting come out, the readers climax collectively, as if there is such a person.

This is called pen power.

Therefore, it is not an easy task for readers to admit that "Poirot is a world-renowned detective", but Chu Kuang did it easily——

Two novels are enough.

The foundation and foreshadowing were laid with "Roger's Mystery".

Use "Murder on the Orient Express" to open up word of mouth and awareness.

Poirot's story may continue in the future, but at this moment, Poirot, the famous detective who let the murderer go, has already ushered in a big hit in the readers' minds!

of course.

Puzzle lovers are also catered for, as this comment puts it:

"I will never guess the tricks of the old thief Chu Kuang! The most hateful thing is that the old thief Chu Kuang swears to give out extremely complicated settings, and even lists the sketches of the carriages and the action schedule of the characters. After racking my brains to fill a sheet of paper, I suddenly threw out his newly invented impossible crime mode!!"

Yes.

Many readers try to find out the truth one step ahead of the detective when they read "Murder on the Orient Express", which is a great hobby for reasoning lovers to read such books.

But when everyone saw the ending, while shocked, they were all dumbfounded.

Did you commit a foul?

Chu Kuang actually completed a new reasoning mode!

There were 12 murderers!

Of course, it had to be "unexpectedly", the passengers in all the cars collectively joined forces to commit crimes, helped each other cover up, and provided alibi, which directly led to the possibility that all the testimony may be false.

Who would have imagined this! ?

Isn't there only one murderer in the normal way of thinking?

Occasionally, there are only two or three people who commit crimes in partnership, right?

But in this novel, all conventional reasoning methods are wrong, and the ending is completely wrong!member!good!people!

At the same time, all!member!fierce!hand!

This is the same as watching Xu Gui for the first time, and you can't guess the murderer no matter what, Chu Kuang's "Murder on the Orient Express", this is another brand new reasoning mode!

Basically impossible to guess!

So after reading it, it’s hard not to be confused!

Not to mention, until the answer was revealed, everyone instinctively thought that what Chu Kuang wrote was Xu Gui.

The media gimmicks are out.

The literary battle between Chu Kuang and Leng Guang, the duel between narration and tradition.

As a result, as soon as Chu Kuang's new book came out, everyone saw the head and realized, ah, this guy is sincerely teasing us. He is the same as Leng Guang's writing this time, and belongs to the category of traditional reasoning!

Even the mode of killing people in the secret room is almost the same!

"I feel that Chu Kuang is really the writer who can play tricks on readers the most, but I am happy to be teased."

"Chu Kuang created narration, but Chu Kuang never said that he can only narrate. When I found out that this is a traditional reasoning, and at the same time it almost subverts the traditional reasoning mode, I will be dumbfounded!"

"As expected of an old thief."

"The old thief is playing with our feelings crazily! He must be hiding somewhere and laughing!"

"The one who was played the worst was obviously Leng Guang, who pulled Chu Kuang to a duel, but Chu Kuang defeated Leng Guang with the traditional reasoning that Leng Guang is best at."

"This is equivalent to Chu Kuang defeating Leng Guang with the martial arts that Leng Guang is best at, which is a bit embarrassing."

"I feel sorry for Leng Guang. Although this guy likes to slander, he doesn't just open his mouth. His slander is basically well-founded. This time he ran into Chu Kuang, it was really bad luck."

"Chu Kuang also slapped the anti-narrative readers in the face. When "Dongdong Suspension Bridge Falls" came out, didn't many people complain that Chu Kuang would be a narrator, and voted for the second one, wanting to pull Chu Kuang off the horse. , As a result, Chu Kuang now tells everyone clearly: Brother's traditional reasoning is even better than Xu Gui's."

"..."

This time it is not brain supplement and over-interpretation.

Lin Yuan really thought this way.

He doesn't want to give everyone the impression that he can only tell tricks.

Therefore, traditional reasoning must be used this time, and it must be a work that is explosive enough.

Now, this work really exploded!

Traditional reasoning can also be used to bring forth the new, and write a killing mode in which all members cooperate!

What a trick within a trick!

It directly swollen the faces of those reasoning fans who disdained Chu Kuang before.

Just like what some readers commented, who would have thought that Chu Kuang's traditional reasoning is better than Xu Gui's!

Those who voted black for Chu Kuang before counted as one, and they were collectively punished to stand in front of "Murder on the Orient Express".

And the aftermath of this explosion not only shocked the readers, but also shocked countless authors in the reasoning circle...

You must know that reasoning writers are the group of people who are most sensitive to reasoning novels.

Readers are just admiring the ingenuity of this story, but the reasoning writers clearly understand how difficult it is to create such a story!

"Chu Kuang is too monstrous!"

On this day, after reading "Murder on the Orient Express", someone in a group of reasoning writers said this with emotion.

In the group, all are +1.

3 Chapter Thirty: Hand of God

Faced with such an outstanding reasoning work as "Murder on the Orient Express", all reasoning writers can only sigh with emotion for this crazy monster!

In fact, it is hard to imagine that such a classic work that can make the Reasoning Association score a super high score is written by a writer with little reasoning experience——

Chu Kuang is indeed prolific.

He can write fantasy novels, and is also very good at short stories, spanning two major fields, and is a genius writer recognized by the novel world.

But to say that Chu Kuang's real deduction creation is actually just "Roger's Mystery". As a result, it was the first time he entered the reasoning circle, and Chu Kuang brought a gorgeous narrative storm!

As for the short story he released last month called "Dongdong Suspension Bridge Falling", everyone did not pay too much attention.

To put it more bluntly, it is Chu Kuang's supplement and enrichment of Xu Gui;

To put it bluntly, this guy is just boring, so he molested the readers, and by the way, he took away a large amount of royalties from the blog, earning a lot of gimmicks.

So far, the impression Chu Kuang has left on the reasoning circle is that he is just a genius who uses his talent to fool readers, to tease readers, and to play tricks.

And until Chu Kuang released "Murder on the Orient Express", all the controversies in the reasoning circle were shattered in front of this work.

No one ever said that Chu Kuang was a frivolous narrator.

No one said that Chu Kuang just used his talent to fool readers.

He is more like a joker now and then, but in fact he is a reasoning master with a gully in his chest!

He almost completed a reasoning show that started with Poirot and ended with Poirot with a pious sense of ritual!

From narrative to traditional...

From game works to classic books...

As a character throughout, Poirot already has a tendency to become a god!

And as the creator of Poirot, Chu Kuang has now become a monstrous "newcomer" in the minds of writers in the reasoning circle!

Well, judging from the number of reasoning works, Chu Kuang is still a newcomer.

But this newcomer is too terrifying, and no reasoning writer is willing to use the description of "newcomer" to describe Chu Kuang.

So the title "Monster" is just right.

This is a title that belongs to Chu Kuang. Who makes it difficult for everyone to regard Chu Kuang as a newcomer? How can a newcomer start from such a high starting point?

"Chu Kuang has become a blur in the reasoning circle. It is said that he is a first-class reasoning writer, and his works have entered the top ten reasoning scores. Wendou finally crushed the cold light who is a first-class reasoning writer, but he is Carter. For the kind of top reasoning master, he has only written two reasonings! Well, I don’t think "Dongdong Suspension Bridge Falling" is not a reasoning."

The industry has a habit of grading different writers.

But everyone found that Chu Kuang could not be graded.

His qualifications are too low, and the upper limit is too high. The current Chu Kuang just has too few works, and no one knows what level Chu Kuang will be in the future.

Anyway, Leng Guang, who suffered a disastrous defeat in this literary battle, is a first-class reasoning writer who is serious and honest, and this can be regarded as one of the references for evaluating Chu Kuang.

Someone shook his head: "The wave of cold light hit a bit badly."

Some people have different opinions: "If it is lost to "Murder on the Orient Express", there is no shame, because it is the same for anyone."

The former sighed: "But after all, I lost, and became the background board of Chu Kuang."

The latter said seriously: "Didn't you notice that everyone didn't laugh at Leng Guang? He did lose, but he showed his level, but the opponent was too inhuman."

Just when the two sides were about to fight, a senior said:

"No one has the right to laugh at Leng Guang. One of the reasoning writers here counts as one? Anyone who goes up and fights "Murder on the Orient Express" will have the same result."

"How is it?"

"They all have to die."

The reasoning circle fell silent.

Chu Kuang's "Murder on the Orient Express" is a nearly invincible work, just like what the senior said? It's not a matter of cold light, anyone who touches this novel will die.

……

Ripples continue to spread, starting from reasoning forums, and eventually sweeping all major related platforms.

Among the top ten scores on the official website of the Reasoning Association? "Murder on the Orient Express" has been included.

The novel comment area is just like other high-score reasoning styles, a string of rainbow farts.

"Chu Kuang's "Murder on the Orient Express" adopts the purest traditional flavor? It presents readers with a feast of reasoning!"

"As more and more mystery novels in the book market begin to use similar routines? We often see a tragedy happen? Detectives go to the scene to do some investigations that no one can understand? Then do some elusive investigations? Or simply disappear for a few days to find clues? Afterwards, the truth will be revealed? As a reader, as a reader, he can only sigh with emotion when he uncovers an astonishing secret? It also brings us humanistic thinking outside the case, which is very rare."

"Yes? In order to make the ending unexpected enough, the authors did not care whether it was the case or the detective's investigation. It was as unimaginable as possible, so the ending was indeed amazing, but it always made me feel that what I read before was useless. , you only need to watch the case happen and watch the detective solve the mystery at the end. I feel like I was a complete idiot when I read the previous investigation part. ; and when the detective finally solved the mystery, he finally understood what was going on in the case."

"What about the promised duel between readers and detectives?"

"Chu Kuang's work this time is completely different. You don't have to spend your time guessing what kind of investigation the detective did. The author will present every step of the detective's investigation and the evidence he obtained in front of the readers, allowing readers and the detective to solve the case together. , I will participate in it unconsciously. The author does not make things difficult for the readers in terms of professional knowledge, investigation conditions or evidence, but tries to make up for the readers’ disadvantages in reading, and provides readers with a platform for thinking, and then does not make fuss about investigations and other issues. , but really achieve the twists and turns of the plot, but also within reason. Readers are allowed to guess and think based on the development of the plot and the gradual increase of evidence, draw conclusions and overthrow their own conclusions, and then continue to guess, Thinking...Until the final answer is given, the reader's thinking has been following the development of the plot, and the answer given is both reasonable and unexpected. Therefore, I can't help admiring the author's careful thinking and ingenious design."

"I think those detective stories that dare not tell readers about the investigation, methods, and evidence of the case are just because they are afraid that readers will guess the result too early and lose interest in the story. He is so clever that he hides and tricks readers in disguise. He always likes to deify the detective. In fact, he does not put the readers on an equal footing with the characters in the story. It's respect."

"Having said so much, in fact, just one sentence, Chu Kuang is a god in this wave."

The tone is a bit from the media, and there is suspicion of stepping on one another, but it also reveals a fact in disguise:

Chu Kuang conquered the picky fans of traditional reasoning.

Not long ago, Chu Kuang's reputation in the reasoning world was in jeopardy because of "Dongdong Suspension Bridge Falling".

As a result, as soon as "Murder on the Orient Express" was released, the world seemed to have changed.

And in this world, there is one person who will not change.