People are in Marvel, and the system is working as a worker

"The establishment of the Avengers, in addition to dealing with the increasingly frequent super villains, is also a force independent of SHIELD." Mike said.

"What kind of enemy is it?" Rogers narrowed his eyes and murmured.He seemed to be talking to himself, but also seemed to be asking Mike.

However, no matter how smart you are, you cannot get the correct answer without enough information.

He looked up at Mike, and the meaning was self-evident.

The Cap that Mike knows is a trustworthy person.To him, Mike did not hide or be vague and said directly: "Hydra!"

"Hydra!" Captain America was undoubtedly shocked.Because he witnessed the "death" of the Red Skull with his own eyes, he thought that Hydra disappeared into the dust of history with the fall of the communist regime.

Captain Rogers made two mistakes.

First of all, the Red Skull is not dead - although that has little to do with Hydra's continuation.

Secondly, the history of Hydra can be traced back to more than 400 years ago.At that time, a powerful alien named "Hive" appeared on the earth.This alien was exiled to a distant unknown planet because of his excessive abilities.The purpose of Hydra's establishment is to save or serve the hive, also called the "Far Star Project".

Therefore, the Hydra led by Red Skull is only a branch of Hydra, and it is not orthodox.

In fact, the Red Skull is neither loyal to the orthodox Hydra nor to the Nazis. He only cares about his own ambitions.

Even if the Red Skull is really dead, the various branches of Hydra are still around.This is a secret organization that is good at breaking things into parts, forbearing, and growing silently, and it is difficult to uproot.

Just like their slogan: "Cut off one head and two more will grow."

Of course, there is no need to elaborate on these with Rogers.Mike just explained Hydra's infiltration of SHIELD, parasitizing SHIELD, using its flesh and blood as the power for its own growth.

It can be said that Hydra and SHIELD broke bones and connected tendons.What Fury is doing is quietly accumulating strength, secretly transferring and hiding S.H.I.E.L.D. assets, and then waiting for Hydra to expose itself before performing a precise operation to completely separate Hydra.

How serious the consequences of failure are, how stressful it is.So - Mike has reason to suspect that Fury did not shave his head, but...

Bald!

Nick Fury, you are worthy of covering up the tragedy of baldness by shaving your head.

Older gingers are more spicy.

Look at Colson, this "young man". The issue of his hairline has been brought up repeatedly, and he's annoyed to death.

Rogers listened carefully and looked serious.

But the heartbeat is speeding up.

Hydra, an old rival.

A sense of mission arises spontaneously.

If it were anyone else, Mike would probably smile and say, "Brother, come on, it's a little fake."

But Cap... there is no doubt that he is such a person: a man of flesh and blood, with pain, troubles, and needs, but when he needs to stand up, he never shrinks back - this is why Cap is so powerful, but never He is a C-bit Avenger and so on.

The cunning Fury knew that Rogers would eventually come to the bowl on his own, no need to sell favors or reason.

Highlight a peace of mind.

In comparison, the process of recruiting Stark was like taking care of a giant baby, feeding him when he was hungry and coaxing him when he was hungry.

It's just frustrating.

Fortunately, hard work pays off. The grown-up Stark still needs a beating, but he is surprisingly reliable at critical moments.

"Mike, why don't you join the Avengers?" Rogers asked after a long silence.

"To put it simply, I don't like it." Mike said: "First of all, I don't like to be restrained."

Rogers asked: "Including legal constraints?"

Regarding Rogers' question, Mike was noncommittal, but asked: "Should you abide by the current laws now, or the laws from 70 years ago?"

"Of course it's the current law..."

Mike laughed:

"The current law is very different from the law 70 years ago, and in some places it is even contradictory. It was right at that time and wrong at this time - it shows that the law is timely and adaptable to the social environment. It represents the general public opinion of most people. The values ​​of the world represent 'order'. But the law has a lag, that is, it may be wrong at a certain point in time or in a certain scene."

"From the perspective of a law enforcement agency, in order to maintain the dignity of the law, even if it is wrong, it must be enforced first. Correction is a matter later. So the question is, should superheroes abide by the law and sit back and let the mistakes continue to be enforced?"

"I don't know what it was like 70 years ago, but today's definition of the American police is law enforcers and punishers who violate the law. Its duties do not include protecting the safety of specific people. In other words, in the field of public security, the American police have active The duty to proactively prevent danger, and specific to an independent citizen, this duty is only based on the independent judgment of the police. In other words, it is your luck for the police to rescue you, and it is your life if the police does not rescue you. Therefore, there is the 'U.S. The police shooting a suicidal citizen sounds ridiculous, but from a legal perspective, it is completely logical news."

"I think that although superheroes are called vigilantes, they should reflect the differences from the American police. For example, they pay more attention to protecting the safety of specific people. I don't like those superheroes who don't kill, and they don't kill super criminals. , always in: jail → jailbreak, crime → jail again, and so on. The innocent people killed by super criminals during their crimes should be the citizens that superheroes should protect. Because of their own beliefs and principles, innocent people die ——It cannot be said to be the responsibility of superheroes, but in this case, what is the difference between superheroes and those American policemen whose lives are behind them? Are they more powerful? "

When Mike saw Rogers frowning, he remembered that Captain America also "doesn't kill", but he wasn't being pedantic.

Mike sighed: "Look, you don't agree with me."

Rogers said: "When you stare into the abyss, the abyss is also staring at you - as the front line of fighting super criminals, superheroes should stick to the bottom line, and the law is undoubtedly the embodiment of universal values ​​and serves as the bottom line. .At least we can avoid the tragedy of 'dragon slayers will eventually become evil dragons'."

Mike shook his head and said: "The most annoying thing is agnosticism. Why can many Americans do evil and be pious at the same time? Because their logic is this: If you kill someone, you will definitely go to hell? Not necessarily - he may be in the future Hitler. If you save people, will you definitely go to heaven? Not necessarily - he may be the Hitler of the future. Who knows what will happen in the future? This is agnosticism. So, believe in God. Belief in God is the only way to definitely go to heaven. The method is as long as you are pious, no matter whether you have crooked melons and cracked jujubes or you have all five poisons."

"I'm not an agnostic. I don't know if I will fall into the abyss and become a dragon because of eliminating evil. What I am sure of is that if these villains don't die, innocent people will definitely die. My logic is that punishing evil means promoting good. , saving one life is better than building a seven-level pagoda. Moreover, I will not take all the responsibility on myself."