A leisurely life that begins with the possession of a game character

(No plot, can be skipped)

If there is a huge antimatter area, it is entirely possible to produce antimatter planets, antimatter life, and antimatter humans.

Hydrogen atoms are not the only atomic structure, just like methane is not the only carbon-based molecule. Under the constraints of the "rules" of gravity, hydrogen atoms continue to gather and squeeze, and eventually reach a critical point, a fusion reaction occurs, and then the first generation of stellar melting pots are produced. New atoms are constantly produced, and the atomic nuclei become heavier and heavier. Eventually, due to the exhaustion of the surrounding hydrogen atoms, the fusion reaction cannot continue, resulting in a huge supernova explosion, and all kinds of atoms are sprayed to every corner of the universe.

These compressed "hydrogen atom aggregates" are not permanent. When the internal instability accumulates for a certain period of time, it will reach a critical point, and then the atoms will decay into a lower-order stable state.

However, the lower the order of the atom, the longer its half-life is usually, and therefore it can continue to exist for a considerable period of time. As a result, these same or different atoms produce magical effects on each other and eventually form various molecules. Because there are many types of atoms, the rules of their interactions are much more complicated. Therefore, the world we are familiar with has so many possibilities, and ultimately life and humans were born.

As for whether humans are the final form of life, it is very likely not. The evolution of life is far from complete, and the imperfections of humans are obvious, so a more perfect form of life will definitely be born.

Besides life, is there another kind of existence? For example, "virtual energy particles" produce things like souls, or "dark matter" is actually a particle space of another dimension? These are currently unknown, but as long as we can find the laws that actually exist, then there must be this possibility.

The last thing to discuss is the ultimate question, not the boring philosophical trilogy (where do you come from, where are you going, who are you), but the most ultimate question: what is the universe, does the first cause exist, and does the universe have an end.

There are two answers to this question. One is creationism, which means that there is a God outside the universe, or an unknown existence beyond this universe.

We are in this universe and cannot know the outside world. But because we cannot know, we do not need to know. The test field, the metaverse, and the multiverse have nothing to do with the laws of this universe. Unless God can break the existing laws, we may not exist in an instant. But if this is the case, then the philosophical trilogy we proposed is also a question that God needs to answer. In this sense, we are equal to God.

Another possibility is that the universe may be a single energy field that is constantly being born and annihilated. This energy field is wrapped in an elastic space. When an annihilation occurs, all matter and energy are concentrated at the same point and merged together. The current laws of the universe will end at this moment, and all the possibilities that have been generated before will also be completely zero at this moment. But at the same time, new laws are about to emerge. And the duration of this law depends on the degree of self-consistency of the law.

Judging from the fact that Zhang Lan is able to possess a game panel, the first possibility is correct. However, Zhang Lan is still not sure whether it is really correct.

Just because you have special abilities, can cast spells, and can see other levels of space, it doesn't mean that the world will necessarily be what you think it is.

If we talk about it from a simple perspective, the God that most scientists talk about and the God that Einstein talked about are actually similar in meaning, and they are definitely not the same as the Christian God.

On the other hand, Zhang Lan was not sure whether the abilities he possessed and the things he saw were really related to gods and merits, or whether this world was just a virtual world and he was just a BUG accidentally added by a programmer from the outside world.

Suppose that this world is really a virtual world like "The Matrix", then how do we discover the truth?

From a philosophical point of view, as long as the virtual world is real enough, it is impossible to discover this, because there is no difference between "true objectivity" and "virtual objectivity that perfectly satisfies the subjective observation of consciousness."

So, is this world real enough?

Before physics developed to the quantum stage, people believed that it was true enough that all scientific laws that could be discovered were both universal and self-consistent, and after thinking about it, they were found to be very consistent with intuition and logic.

Including classical mechanics, thermodynamics, electromagnetic theory, etc., there is no apparent problem and it is easy to learn.

However, since physics has developed to the quantum stage, various counterintuitive experimental phenomena have begun to appear.

First of all, light has the dual nature of wave and particle. An object is both a wave and a particle, and whether it is a wave or a particle actually depends on how you observe it. This is already very counterintuitive. Fortunately, science does not succumb to intuition. Scientists don't think about it if they can't figure it out. Let's just assume that cats can be dead and alive at the same time.

Then the half-lens experiment (delayed choice experiment) is even more outrageous. Scientists fiddled with it again and again, and found that the real world does not obey the law of causality.

Why is this illogical? No one knows. Fortunately, science does not succumb to logic. The experimental results are what they are. Scientists only believe in facts.

Then there is the problem of the identical nature of photons. Two photons, or many elementary particles, cannot be numbered and distinguished. They can be confused at will, and once they are confused, the phenomenon used to distinguish them will disappear.

This is another phenomenon that goes against intuition and logic. We know from birth that no matter how similar two objects look, they can be distinguished from each other. Why can't particles be distinguished from each other? Physicists don't know either, and can only agree with the fact.

Next is the even more bizarre phenomenon of particle spin. The spin of a particle is like a strange nature. Every time you measure it, it may change. Particles that have just been separated by a magnetic field and have the same spin direction are still half up and half down when separated again. Does this conform to common sense? Of course not, and physicists can only say that the spin phenomenon has no classical counterpart.

Then there is the problem of quantum entanglement, the action at a distance that exceeds the speed of light, as if space does not exist in reality. Why is this so? Physicists still don't know, even though they can describe it with formulas, and even use this law for confidential communication, but no one can give a simple answer that conforms to intuition and logic.

Modern physicists can only admit that quantum phenomena cannot be understood intuitively. No matter how you understand these laws, deep down, you don’t really understand why things are the way they are. Even many great people who have studied quantum physics for a lifetime still have such questions in their minds.