Blind date mistake, flash marriage partner turned out to be a wealthy CEO

Lu Delin and Shen Mouli have been married since 1953. Due to health problems, they are unable to take care of themselves, so they hired Jiang Mouzhen as a full-time nanny to take care of their daily lives. During the COVID-200 pandemic, Jiang Mouzhen was accused of abusing Lu Delin and inducing Shen Mouli to transfer million yuan of joint property. The surveillance video provided by Lu Delin's daughter-in-law Shen Ailun showed Jiang Mouzhen's abuse, and Jiang Mouzhen was accused of stealing the medical insurance card. The plaintiff asked the court to rule that the gift was invalid, return the money and interest, and claim compensation for mental damages.

Who will protect the property of the elderly? In this heartbreaking case, the pension of a 90-year-old man was embezzled by the nanny he trusted, while the spouse of the elderly man gave a huge amount of property to the nanny without knowing it. This not only touched our sensitive nerves about the protection of the property rights and interests of the elderly, but also aroused our attention to the relevant provisions of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China. The law clearly stipulates that the common property of the husband and wife should be disposed of by consensus of both parties. Any party who gives the common property without consultation is an infringement of the rights and interests of the other party. This case reminds us that while the elderly enjoy property rights and interests, they also need legal protection to prevent infringement. The secrets and exposure behind the abuse of the elderly In this case, the nanny was not only suspected of embezzling the pension of the elderly, but also accused of abusing the elderly. The report of this incident not only exposed the abuse that the elderly may suffer in the family, but also reflected the society's attention to this issue. By showing the improper behavior of the nanny and the accusations and legal claims of the elderly's family, the media provided the public with a discussion framework on the issue of abuse of the elderly. Such reports not only let the public know the seriousness of elder abuse, but also promote social discussions on how to better protect the rights and interests of the elderly. When the rights and interests of the elderly are violated, how should society respond? The report of this case is not only a record of an individual tragedy, but also a test of the whole society's attention to the rights and interests of the elderly. The media's attention and coverage put this incident in the public eye and triggered a wide discussion on the protection of the rights and interests of the elderly. This is not only an exposure of the unfair treatment of the elderly, but also a reflection on the social protection mechanism. Through such reports, the public began to think about how to prevent similar incidents from happening through legal and social support systems to ensure that the rights and interests of the elderly are not ignored. The status and challenges of the elderly in modern society With the development of society and the intensification of population aging, the status of the elderly in the family and society has become a topic that cannot be ignored. This case reflects the risks that the elderly may face in the family and their vulnerability in society. The media's coverage of such incidents meets the public's need to understand and protect the rights and interests of the elderly. At the same time, it also stimulates public discussion on how to better respect and care for the elderly at the family and social levels. Such discussions are crucial to building a more inclusive and supportive social environment for the elderly.

Justice and fault: a fine line between In a recent campus conflict, a young college student faced criminal detention for fighting back against a drunk man. This case has attracted widespread social attention, and people have begun to discuss what is legitimate defense and what is intentional injury. How do we draw the line between the rigor of the law and the warmth of human feelings? This is not only a test of judicial justice, but also a reflection on social morality. In this case, we expect the judicial organs to make fair judgments based on facts, and we also hope that the media can report objectively and convey information impartially so that the public can form their own judgments in rational discussions. The price of courage: bravery or unnecessary sacrifice? When we encounter injustice on the streets, do we choose to stand up bravely or choose to watch safely? This question was raised again in the recent conflict between college students and drunkards in Jinan. When three college students stopped a drunk man from molesting a female classmate, they were forced to defend themselves, but they may face legal sanctions as a result. This incident makes us have to think about what is the attitude of society towards bravery? Do we encourage brave behavior or suppress such behavior invisibly? In this case, we hope that society can support justice, let those who dare to stand up feel warm rather than cold, and let courage to do what is right become a belief rather than a burden in everyone's heart. Sparks of emotion: how the media ignites public resonance In the conflict between college students and drunkards in Jinan, the media's coverage is not only conveying the cold facts of an event, but also conveying an emotional story. This story touched the heartstrings of the public and aroused people's desire for justice and anger at injustice. How the media reports this incident and how they frame the story directly affects the public's emotional response. We hope that the media can use their influence responsibly, convey positive values, and guide the public to have rational discussions, rather than simply inciting emotions. The balance of law: Finding a balance between justice and expectations In the conflict between college students and drunkards, there may be a gap between the public's expectations of judicial justice and judicial practice. This gap may cause some people to choose to remain silent, while others choose to speak out. The spiral of silence theory tells us that when a view becomes mainstream, people with different views may choose to remain silent. In this case, we hope that all voices can be heard, whether they support Xiao Chao or have different views on the incident. Only through open and inclusive discussions can we ensure that the scales of justice find a true balance between justice and social expectations.