Fudan University Campus Open: Civilized Convention Leads Harmonious Shared Space Recently, Fudan University's campus opening policy has attracted widespread attention. The school not only provides a convenient way to enter the school, but also specially issued a detailed campus visit civilized convention. This convention is not only a behavioral guide, but also a cultural transmission. It involves many aspects such as school entry verification, traffic rules, public property protection and canteen dining, aiming to maintain the safety and civilized order of the campus. The release of the convention reflects Fudan University's sense of responsibility and leading role as a higher education institution, and also shows the openness and tolerance of campus culture. For the general public, this is a good opportunity to experience university culture and enjoy the campus environment, and it is also a practice to learn and practice the civilized convention. New trend of campus visits: Fudan University's civilized invitation As a famous university in Shanghai, Fudan University recently opened its campus to the outside world and formulated a series of visiting rules. This is not only a need for campus management, but also an advocacy of social civilization. The release of the campus visit civilized convention not only regulates the behavior of visitors, but also triggers discussions in society on how to visit in a civilized manner and respect the educational environment. This discussion helps to enhance the public's awareness of civilization and promote social harmony. At the same time, this also provides a management reference for other universities and may become a precedent for promoting more universities to open their campuses. Civilized consensus and implementation difficulties: Fudan University's campus convention practice Fudan University's campus visit civilization convention is not only a piece of paper, but also a framework of expectations for public behavior. Each provision in the convention reflects respect for the campus environment and culture, and also puts forward specific requirements for visitors. Although these requirements restrict the freedom of visitors to a certain extent, more importantly, they enhance the visitors' sense of responsibility and civilized awareness. However, the implementation of the convention also faces challenges. How to ensure that every visitor can abide by the regulations and not affect the normal order of the campus requires the joint efforts of the school, visitors and all sectors of society. The choice of individual behavior in the macro environment: the personal impact of Fudan University's civilized convention The opening of Fudan University's campus meets the curiosity and demand of the public for the cultural experience of universities. The formulation of the campus visit civilization convention is both a guide for visitors and an expectation for their behavior. The provisions in the convention, such as avoiding peak dining hours and consciously queuing for meals, are all guiding them to make civilized and orderly behavioral choices while meeting public needs. This kind of interaction not only reflects the openness of campus culture, but also reflects the requirements of social civilization and progress. While enjoying the campus environment, visitors are also contributing to the maintenance of this shared space through their own behavior.

Social responsibility behind campus violence Recently, a campus violence incident in Xinxiang, Henan Province has attracted widespread attention from the society. A 9-year-old boy and his mother were beaten by their classmates' parents at the school gate, resulting in injuries and hospitalization. Reporting such incidents is not only about conveying information, but also a manifestation of the media's social responsibility. Through in-depth reporting on this incident, the media can arouse the public's attention to campus safety and child protection, and promote the improvement and implementation of relevant laws and regulations. At the same time, the media should also pay attention to the deep-seated reasons behind the incident, such as family education, school management and other issues, in order to promote the joint efforts of all sectors of society to build a safer and more harmonious campus environment. Spiral of silence: When violence becomes a shadow on the campus The campus should be a safe haven for students, but this campus violence incident in Xinxiang, Henan Province may have triggered a spiral of silence among the public. In this case, those who oppose campus violence may choose to remain silent for fear of social isolation, especially when there is a lack of clear social condemnation and legal sanctions. This silence may lead to the fact that violent behavior does not receive enough social attention and prevention, which to a certain extent contributes to the breeding of campus violence. Therefore, the public's active voice and the media's continued attention are crucial. They can break the spiral of silence, provide support to victims, and promote the formation of a consensus on zero tolerance for school violence. Labels of violence: How the media shapes our views on school violence In the school violence incident in Xinxiang, Henan, how the media reports the incident is particularly important. Framing theory tells us that the media influences the public's cognition and emotions by selecting specific information and angles to construct news stories. If the media overemphasizes the intensity and drama of violent acts, it may cause public panic and excessive concern about school safety. On the contrary, if the media can balance reporting, focusing not only on the incident itself, but also on the causes, impacts and solutions behind the incident, the public's understanding of this social problem will be more comprehensive. Such reports can promote the public's in-depth thinking on the issue of school violence and promote all sectors of society to take effective measures to jointly protect the safety and rights of children. The voice of the audience: Why school violence incidents have attracted widespread attention The reason why the school violence incident in Xinxiang, Henan has attracted widespread attention is closely related to the needs of the audience. The uses and gratifications theory points out that the audience will choose and pay attention to media content according to their own needs. In this incident, parents and the public are generally concerned about their children's safety and education, so they are highly sensitive and concerned about any news that may affect their children's well-being. In addition, such incidents touch upon the public's expectations for justice and social order. People are eager to know the truth of the incident and hope that the perpetrators will be punished as they deserve. They also hope that such reports can promote social reflection and prevention of school violence. Therefore, when reporting such incidents, the media should fully consider these needs of the audience and provide comprehensive, in-depth and constructive reports to meet the public's information needs and social responsibility.

Gating theory in news reporting: Why was only the news of 49 trapped runners reported? In the report, we noticed that only the news of 49 trapped runners was reported, which is consistent with the explanation of gating theory. According to the theory, editors and reporters consider factors such as news value and social norms when choosing what to report. In this news event, the situation of 49 trapped runners has certain news value because they are in trouble under extreme weather conditions and need rescue. In addition, reporting this event is also consistent with social norms because paying attention to and caring about the safety of trapped runners is a topic of general concern to the public. Therefore, the media chooses to report this news to meet readers' needs and concerns for news. However, other details and background information may be considered by editors and reporters to be not newsworthy enough or inconsistent with social norms, so they are not reported. This also illustrates the application of gating theory in news reporting. When editors and reporters decide which information to report, they will screen and select information to meet readers' needs and concerns. Media agenda setting: Why did the story of the trapped runners in the -mile cross-country race become the focus? The story of the trapped runners in the -mile cross-country race became the focus of the media, which is consistent with the explanation of agenda setting theory. According to the theory, the media influences which issues the public considers important by choosing which topics to report. In this news event, the safety and rescue of the trapped runners became the focus of media attention because it involved people's life safety and emergency rescue. The media chose to report this story, putting it at the forefront of the public agenda, attracting public attention and discussion. At the same time, other details and background information may be considered by the media to be not important enough and therefore not become the focus. This also illustrates the application of agenda setting theory in media reporting, where the media guides the direction of public attention and discussion by choosing which topics to report. Media frame selection: How does it influence public opinion about the trapped runners in the -mile cross-country race? When reporting the story of the trapped runners in the -mile cross-country race, the media chose specific frames to influence public opinion about the event. According to framing theory, the media influences the public's interpretation and understanding of the event by choosing frames to report information, emphasizing different aspects, roles, causal relationships, or moral evaluations. In this news event, the media may choose to emphasize the plight of the runners and the urgency of the need for rescue to arouse public sympathy and attention. At the same time, the media may also emphasize the responsibilities and response measures of the organizing committee to evaluate its response capabilities and event safety. These frame choices will affect the public's views and attitudes toward the event, thereby shaping the public's evaluation of the event organizers and contestants. Therefore, the media's frame choices play an important role in the reporting, shaping the public's cognition and attitude toward the event. Spiral Silence Theory: Why do trapped contestants remain silent in public? According to the spiral silence theory, the trapped contestants remain silent in public because they consider that their views are inconsistent with mainstream opinions and are worried about social isolation. According to the theory, when individuals express their opinions in public, they will consider whether their opinions are consistent with mainstream opinions to avoid being excluded and isolated due to different opinions. In this news event, the trapped contestants may realize that their opinions may be different from those of the organizing committee or other contestants, so they choose to remain silent to avoid causing controversy or unnecessary conflicts. This is also consistent with the explanation of the spiral silence theory. When individuals express their opinions in public, they will consider whether their opinions are consistent with mainstream opinions to avoid social isolation and adverse consequences.

Tap the screen to use advanced tools Tip: You can use left and right keyboard keys to browse between chapters.

You'll Also Like