Siheyuan started as an unlicensed knight and became a hero of justice

Wu Zhen hated the corrupt officials and social parasites, but he only had the right to inspect and make suggestions. In an era when the legal system could not keep up with the pace of the times, he was very helpless.

How Wu Zhen wished he had the three guillotines of Bao Qingtian, but he didn't have them. Moreover, the skills of Bao Qingtian that he expected did not appear. Only the skill of scare away gods and ghosts appeared.

This skill should be a derivative skill of Incorruptibility and Impartiality, or an enhanced version of part of it.

But why is it not righteousness? Is it because I haven't reached the standard yet?

The skill of Shenguibiyi is actually a combination of passive and active skills.

Actively using the skill of warding off gods and ghosts can have a deterrent effect on people who have guilty consciences, causing them to lose their minds. It complements the skills of the five hearings and distinguishing right from wrong.

The passive skill of Shenguibiyi is to prevent Wu Zhen from being harmed by evil and crooked means, including but not limited to false accusations, slander, and frame-ups, etc. . . . . .

This passive skill is quite good. You don't have to worry about being framed or accused of something unfounded.

However, Wu Zhen sometimes felt really confused, and he didn't even know whether some of the things he did were right or not.

Although he was only responsible for intelligence and making suggestions, the more intelligence he obtained and the more suggestions he made, the more he felt something was wrong.

Although Wu Zhen felt that he had a clear conscience and that he was working for the prosperity of his motherland, why did he always feel that something was not right?

Because I am gradually realizing that my understanding of justice has become a little confused.

At first Wu Zhen thought that the three kinds of justice, namely, justice for the common people, justice for the region and justice for the country, were from low to high and these kinds of justice were compatible.

However, as he grew older and gained more experience, he discovered that his original idea was actually wrong!

Just like being a hero can have nothing to do with justice, a hero can be a definition, a profession, or a name for a type of people. Similarly, justice can be divided into many kinds!

Therefore, there is no such thing as absolute justice. There is only relative justice based on the position you choose.

Sometimes, even more often, justice and evil are not absolute. The so-called justice is only relative to one's own position!

Just like the heroes of Marvel in the United States illustrate this point very well.

Sometimes, there is only a slight difference between a hero and a thug, or there is no difference at all. Today's thug may be yesterday's hero who has turned evil.

In other words, the so-called dragon slayer of that year ended up becoming the evil dragon he had slain!

So, in our view, there are both righteous and evil heroes in America.

Similarly, much of the so-called American justice may be evil to other countries!

Therefore, our just position is that there is nothing wrong with China as a country.

But can I still represent the justice of the region and the justice of the civilians at the same time?

Wu Zhen was thinking, have I already left the class of common people? Have I no longer thought about fighting for fairness and justice for them?

For example, in this reform and opening up, someone had to make sacrifices, but my suggestion was to sacrifice the interests of the majority of farmers. Is this right?

So, in terms of regional justice here, the city residents are on the side of the city residents, right?

Compared with the civilian justice that he originally represented, isn’t this choice contrary to the civilian justice that he once implemented?

Wu Zhen couldn't help but sigh. Perhaps, only when our country's overall strength is improved and the economy grows can we consider fairness, justice and equity.

Sometimes reality is really cruel. Fairness, justice and stability must first be based on food and clothing.

As the saying goes, "When the granaries are full, people will know etiquette." If even the most basic survival cannot be fully guaranteed, then what else can we talk about?

If people are starving to death, can justice still be eaten?