Six years later, she amazed the world with her three children

Because this is just a small lawsuit, because in addition to the two parties and their respective lawyers, the only people in the courtroom are Shen Xiyao, Ou Xiangbei and Bai Yanxin.

The presiding judge, who was sitting at the top, dropped the gavel in his hand and said majestically: "This court is now officially opening the trial of Mo Chengsi's lawsuit against Mo Chengyu for defamation."

After the preliminary procedures were completed, Mo Chengsi's attorney stood up and handed over some of the materials he had sorted out to the judge, and then said: "The defendant Mo Chengyu once gathered several domestic media bigwigs and wantonly slandered my client in front of the media, and even slandered my client for attempted murder, which caused great damage to my client's reputation.

Since the incident, my client has been subjected to long-term cyberbullying, and his business and life have been severely affected. His body and mind have suffered severe trauma, so I think the defendant’s behavior this time is serious and must be severely punished! "

The information that Mo Chengsi's lawyer presented just now was a collection of various remarks attacking Mo Chengsi, including the loss of many major partners, and even the recent physical and mental examination of Mo Chengsi. The examination report showed that he already had a tendency to depression.

"What our client said is all true. There is no fabrication or defamation. Now I ask your honor to call our witness to the stand." Mo Chengyu's defense lawyer said.

The judge agreed, and then the defendant's witness came on stage. He was the director of the mental hospital. Mo Chengsi was relieved to see it was him. As long as the witness was not Han Chuxue and Aunt Sun, he was not afraid.

"Please ask the witness to tell the story."

The director of the mental hospital said, "At the beginning, President Mo... no, it was Mo Chengsi who found me and asked the mental hospital to accept someone. It was the Aunt Sun that Mo Chengyu mentioned in front of the media before. I accepted her into the mental hospital."

"Then may I ask, what was Ms. Sun's mental state at the time? Was she normal or was she diagnosed with mental problems?" asked lawyer Mo Chengyu.

This question is particularly important. The director of the mental hospital replied: "It is normal."

"Okay." Lawyer Mo Chengyu looked at the judge. "My witness said that Ms. Sun was mentally normal at the time. This proves that our client was just stating objective facts and there was no defamation at all. Next, I would like to ask the plaintiff, how do you explain sending a normal person to a mental hospital?"

"Before our client answers, I would like to ask the other party's witness a question first," asked Lawyer Mo Chengsi.

"approve."

After the judge approved it, Mo Chengsi's lawyer walked up to the director of the mental hospital, looked him straight in the eyes, and said word by word: "Please ask the other witness to look into my eyes now and answer my next question."

"I think the other side's lawyer's behavior is suspected of inducement and threat."

"Your Honor, I just want the witness to speak the truth better. There is no threat."

The judge then said to attorney Mo Chengyu: "The objection is invalid, plaintiff's attorney, please proceed."

"Thank you, Judge." After Mo Chengsi's lawyer finished speaking, he looked at the director of the mental hospital and said in a somewhat aggressive tone, "Now I ask you to describe in detail the situation when the defendant came to you for questioning. Please note that it is a detailed description. Please explain his tone, voice, attitude, and even his eyes at that time."

Hearing this question from Lawyer Mo Chengsi, the director of the mental hospital looked at Mo Chengyu unconsciously. At this time, Lawyer Mo Chengsi reminded him seriously:

"Don't look me in the eye and answer my question. I need to remind you that this is a courtroom. Everything you say has legal consequences. If you lie, it will be perjury and you will be held legally responsible."

Hearing this, the director of the mental hospital could only tell the truth: "Mo Chengyu came to me that day and he was really aggressive, and then..."

"And then what? Did he threaten you? Like, threaten you with your family, or threaten you with a sharp weapon himself?"

"Your Honor, he is clearly trying to entice our witness!"

"I'm not trying to seduce him. I just want him to tell the truth."

The judge added: "The objection is invalid, but the plaintiff's lawyer should pay attention to your attitude in questioning."

"Okay, Your Honor, defense witness, please continue to explain in detail how the defendant threatened you?"

"He...he was carrying a dagger, and if I didn't tell the truth he wanted to kill me..."

After hearing what the director of the mental hospital said, Shen Xiyao and the others suddenly became nervous. If they continued asking questions, it was very likely that the director's words would not be able to serve as testimony.

"Did you hear that, Your Honor? The witness himself admitted that it was Mo Chengyu who threatened him. In this case, can the defendant's witness' words have any legal effect?"

"The witness himself admitted that it was not our client who threatened him. The key point of his statement is obviously in the latter part."

Mo Chengyu's lawyer immediately said, "Pay attention, his emphasis is on the three words 'tell the truth'. It is very clear. He himself admitted that he did not tell the truth first, which angered our client.

I admit that my client has demented behavior, but may I ask, what does the law pursue? The law pursues the truth! The real result! Without certain means, my client cannot obtain a factual result.

Now that our client has obtained the truth through means, if we say that we made a mistake, isn’t it a case of two hands tango? And since we helped the law find the truth, isn’t that a greater merit than a fault? "

"Opposite lawyer, you are obviously trying to change the concept. If you use illegal means to obtain the truth, how much value does the truth have? I now have every reason to suspect that the defendant threatened his witness, so that he is committing perjury!

Our client said that Ms. Sun was indeed mentally ill and was sent to a mental hospital by him out of kindness. The current examination results also prove that Ms. Sun is mentally ill.

Then I would like to ask, apart from your testimony, what evidence do you have to prove that Ms. Sun was mentally clear before being admitted to the hospital? If there is no evidence, it is defamation! "

"Then what evidence do you have to prove that Ms. Sun had mental problems before she was admitted to the hospital?" asked Mo Chengyu's defense lawyer.

“But under the premise that neither side had evidence, our client did not do anything to defame the defendant, but the defendant took the initiative to defame and even fabricated facts to frame our client!

Now we are the plaintiffs and you are sitting in the dock. According to the legal principle of presumption of innocence, you have slandered our client without sufficient evidence. This is a fact!

I now request the judge to conduct a fair trial and severely punish the defendant for fabricating facts and slandering my client!"