original owner

A group of people on the Internet are arguing non-stop, arguing about "Returning Back", arguing about whether Hongyan's guests are hot or not, and arguing over the fact that the story of "Returning Back" actually has an example in reality. "I've been digging a hole" can be seen everywhere on the edge.

Neither Zhou Zhe's fans nor sunspots are willing to show weakness. Generally speaking, when encountering such a situation, the author should kindly persuade everyone to stop arguing. It is the author's fault to ruin an article, even if Zhou Zhe has a reason You shouldn't continue to provoke conflicts between readers and black fans. After all, two cheating articles can really kill an author's life.

However, what makes readers desperate is that Zhou Zhe himself does not stop under such circumstances. He will "confess" Hongyan guest in a high-profile way on Weibo, and sigh on Weibo that he really can't go back to write "Tianhui". The more he writes, the more he gets angry, and the readers who find fault on Weibo after a while are not as low-key as he was when he just cheated "First Makeup".

But fortunately, the readers who were silent because the plot of "Backward" developed to a stage that they could not understand have now regained their spirits and are speaking for him.

To be honest, no one is a match for this group of readers who have experienced the turmoil of the original author's pen closure. They have experienced the most chaotic years in the Internet literature circle. What kind of people have you not seen during the most quarrelsome period?Leaving the web literature circle doesn't mean they can't surpass others, it's just that they become disheartened because their favorite authors have left.

What makes new readers angry is that the collection of "Returning Back" did not fall to the bottom with the statement of the cheating father who has been digging holes. With the appearance of Hongyan guests, the readers under the old author's account suddenly came back to life , Seeing Zhou Zhe actually write their big encounters into the novel, even because of this, he was so sad that he had to stop updating, and they all fell in love with Zhou Zhe.

In their hearts, they are no longer willing to return to the Internet circle to suffer. They also know that digging a hole is a rare original author who dares to post on the Internet these days. In fact, they don’t want to keep digging holes and continue writing Wen, they have seen the most shameless plagiarists, and they have also seen many original creators fall under the abuse of fans of plagiarists. However, even if they hope that they have been digging holes to seal the pen, the reason for the seal should not be Jinjiang Readers crusade - although he cheated two articles in a row, the reasons for cheating articles are reasonable, and this should not be an excuse for readers to criticize her.

So fans of Hongyan Laibin have collected the column he has been digging and all his articles, and followed his Weibo to help him resist the dirty water poured by Heizi.

Readers in the new "era" screamed that this is unscientific, why can an author's irresponsible cheating article get so many people's support-the article's receipts actually exceeded 15!And the most terrible thing is that with the increase of fans, the ranking of this article has jumped to the top ten. It not only occupies the weekly list of Bawang votes, but also occupies a place in the overall list of Bawang votes.

Not to mention the readers, the authors who are overwhelmed by "Returning Back" are going crazy.

They would rather be overwhelmed by newly signed authors than unsigned authors.

So they also cursed out loud, yelling what is wrong with the current Internet literature circle, why can an unsigned and irresponsible author get the support of so many people!

The old readers looked at this group of people roaring, laughing so happily that they burst into tears.

Didn't they also cry and shout when they saw the overwhelming plagiarism in front of them, cursing that the online literary circle should not be dominated by such abnormal writing methods?What did their roars achieve in the end?

Now the situation on both sides is reversed. The angrier these authors and readers are, the happier they laugh. After so many years, they feel that they are finally at ease.

Unexpectedly, not long after this incident started, Zhou Zhe gave them a new joke.

More than a month ago, after the end of "Dyeing", there were more than a dozen self-recommended comments overnight. Some of them changed the names of people or places and used them as their own articles, and some people read them from "Dipping". I selected a part of the plot and integrated it into the article I have already written.

At that time, these recommendations made many readers arbitrarily cheat one article and another. How many diehard fans does he have in Jinjiang?Not many people obeyed his statement, so many people chased him at that time.

Even during this period, there is no shortage of readers who compare "Zip" with those self-recommended novels, but "Zip" has ended and many ancient readers have come back recently to make up points. So these comparative reviews did not cause any waves.

Those self-recommended people have been wasting like this for more than a month, and many people even openly made "self-comments" in their articles-commenting on the advantages of their own articles compared with "Zhiyan". Although there are self-criticisms, they are ultimately Self-praise accounted for a large proportion.

In the final analysis, it was nothing more than bullying Zhou Zhe as a newcomer.

After more than a month, the disadvantages of this group of articles that "referenced" "Jian Zhan" finally emerged.

"Borrowing", generally speaking, there are two types. One is to extract and recombine the plots you like, so that the borrowed texts basically concentrate the essence of other people's texts, and the texts that can integrate these plots will basically not rush. , It is not impossible to even use this to enshrine the gods.The other is to copy completely, maybe some new plots will be added in the middle, but basically the plot is still based on the original plot, and the worst "reference" is the full-text "reference" type that only changes the name.

This time, I have covered both of the two self-recommended essays under "Dyeing".

The former finally attracted negative comments after more than a month of writing, and even the author himself could not continue writing.

Even readers who are accustomed to borrowing from Rongjing's essays can't stand the new plot of "Zhiye". The way people speak is mixed with ancient Chinese and vernacular, and she uses vernacular to explain historical stories and classical Chinese to describe original stories.

This method of mixing vernacular and classical Chinese in the whole "Dyeing" will not make people feel awkward, but if you intercept it separately and put it in other articles, it will definitely make readers dizzy and unable to understand anything — After all, not all readers are high school students at the pinnacle of knowledge.

And although it is said to be borrowed from "Dyeing", it is very inconsistent to borrow from the past. It is not that no one has borrowed from historical original novels in the past, but this kind of rigorous textual research is so outrageous that it would have been ten years ago. It is rare, so unless you think about how to transition from the previous text to the subsequent text before merging, or temporarily decide to intercept a part of this article as your own work, it will appear that these authors now get the best results.

The author of "Dyeing" has been digging holes. When serializing this article, he seems to believe that the readers of his article are all academic masters. He will not explain the background of many stories. He once said in the comment area that these are written. He doesn't need to go into details about the history that entered the history books. Of course, he and his readers are very happy to popularize science in the comment area.

But the popular science in the comment area and the explanation in the article are different after all.

He can do it, and his readers can do it, but it doesn't mean that this group of authors and readers can also do it.

This has led to the fact that when this group of people borrowed from "Dipping", the author himself could not understand the text, and he was unwilling to spend time reading popular science posts under the text-even if he had followed "Since" before and knew that there was science popularization underneath, but after smashing There are more and more comments on Lei's score, and now it's difficult to find the previous comments - I can only bite the bullet, the more I write, the more they can't persist.

God testifies, this is the most difficult time for them to learn from and borrow since they wrote the article.

They don't understand it, and readers don't understand it even more.

Readers only know that the light-hearted novels they were chasing before have inexplicably turned into advanced and rigorous texts on textual research. The most important thing is that the so-called "textual research" makes no sense to them: for example, why did ancient times have Cold drinks, such as why marriage is not a phoenix crown and Xiapei, another example is that the pronunciation of the eunuch's summoning is definitely wrong, and another example is why an eunuch dares to confront the court ministers?

These clear historical materials in the history of the Ming Dynasty make every popular science post under "Zhiyan" justified, but when another author moved these stalks into his own article, there was a problem: your article is either empty or Other history, so the stalks you added obviously don't match your previous article!The funniest thing is that a certain author described a grand wedding of a bride with ten miles of red makeup in Fengguanxiapei. Why did the following become a self-slapping "forbidden Fengguanxiapei"?Also described as many as five chapters around this point?

Even if today's readers are easy to be fooled, there is no reason to be so fooled!

Also, can those classical Chinese be replaced by vernacular?They just want to read the text to relax and they don't come to school. Why do they have to suffer from these classical Chinese texts after they have left high school?Not to mention science students, even liberal arts students will go crazy after reading it, and the content of your classical Chinese article is different from the previous introduction!

The author himself is also very wronged. If he can convert it into vernacular Chinese, would he still copy classical Chinese?The key is that these passages of classical Chinese are either a link between the past and the future or are important dialogues, and they cannot be deleted!

In the end, the complaints turned into ridicules of "Big Daddy, you wanted to be rigorous, but in the end you were rigorous and full of loopholes", and some readers from "Dyeing" expressed their disappointment.These articles don't get the essence of "Dyeing" at all. When I read these articles, I still find them interesting. How come they become uninteresting once they enter the plot of "Dyeing"?Obviously "Zhi Dye" is so good-looking, don't you be a black fan of "Zhi Dye", you don't want to criticize "Zhi Dye" if you deliberately fight for your reputation, right?

The readers who climbed out from the bottom of Zhou Zhe's pit are now undoubtedly the most troublesome existence for the authors, because they dare to ask anything and question everything, but they use the most sincere tone so that you can't find mistakes, but they Ask questions that the author himself cannot answer.

In the end, they had no choice but to go to Weibo or Aite or send a private letter to Zhou Zhe, saying that they encountered a bottleneck in borrowing his essays, and hoped that Zhou Zhe could guide them on how to write the essays.

Zhou Zhe took a screenshot and responded to these "help requests" in unison.

Pit Bottom: So why should I teach the thief who stole my things how to use my things? 【screenshot】