Acting King's Daily [Comprehensive British and American]

The box office of "The Truman Show" in the first weekend was 4394 million US dollars, and successfully topped the North American weekend box office list with a single box office of 1.51 US dollars.

Twentieth Century Fox should thank "The Truman Show" for its excellent film quality, otherwise, go and read the evaluations of those fans who clamored to be deceived by the propaganda on IMDB.Of course, while claiming that they were deceived by "false propaganda", they did not give "The Truman Show" a low score, and even gave it a fairly high score.

Taken together, "The Truman Show" has a comprehensive score of 17526 (out of 91) from 100 ordinary movie fans on IMDB. Among the fans of the premiere, the fans of the big triangle accounted for a large proportion) participated in scoring, this score will change, generally speaking, it will decline, but this high score is undoubtedly an affirmation of "The Truman Show" .

The media evaluation of "The Truman Show" is also quite good:

"The New York Times" commented: ""The Truman Show" is a unique and creative film. The film is not only thought-provoking and touching, but also has a humorous humor. Eric Ze In the film, Weir successfully interpreted the innocence and complex personality, allowing the audience to see a performance that is different from his introverted and unrestrained performance in "Gait Shot".

The famous film critic Roger Ebert of the "Chicago Sun-Times" viewed it this way: "Accompanied by the actors' deep and admirable performances, director Andrew Nicholl has perfectly completed a deeply ironic, Excellent movie."

The influential magazine "The New Yorker" believes: "From the surface, "The Truman Show" seems to be a ridiculous fable about life, but deep inside, the audience finds that the meaning contained in it is profound. Yes, it can be chilling, because maybe one day, the audience will start worrying about whether the same thing is happening around them."

The media who participated in the premiere of "The Truman Show" were all well-received without exception. The excellent word-of-mouth and the strong box office in the first weekend made people in the industry very optimistic about the stamina of "The Truman Show". The box office of "The Truman Show" in North America will exceed 2 million U.S. dollars. Considering the budget cost of "The Truman Show" is 6000 million U.S. dollars, the box office in North America alone is enough to easily make a profit.

When Hollywood shouts "box office harvester" is coming again, by the way, it can be eaten with the new issue of "Time" ("TIME"). The cover of the latest issue of "Times Weekly" is Eric Xavier, the actor who played Truman in "The Truman Show", but in the latest issue of "Times Weekly", he did not accept "Times" as an actor. "Weekly" interview, but as the successor of EX Industry and a talented researcher, this interview can be said to be a summary of the third EX Industry Expo not long ago.

Considering that the third exposition of EX industry was quite successful and its influence in the world is changing with each passing day, it is understandable that Time Magazine will make a special topic on it, and it is not the first time that Eric Xavier On the cover of "Time Magazine", the earliest one dates back to 95 when he won the Summit Award for the first time.

If it is said that the third EX Industrial Expo has been successfully concluded for a month, "Time" only reported it after four issues, no matter how you look at it, it seems to be an "afterthought", but this is not just in time for "The Truman Show" Is it showing? Richard Scheker, a film critic of "Time Magazine", is also on the invitation list for the premiere of "The Truman Show". He also wrote a film review very carefully, which was published in this issue of "Time Magazine" "superior.

So, everything is flawless.

Not to mention, the cover of "Time Magazine" still has its usual style, which is the legendary "big head photo" style, and obviously Eric Xavier is a handsome guy with 360° without dead ends, and the "big head photo" will not hurt him handsome.

A handsome guy who can withstand the "big photo" is a real handsome guy. Let's not talk about whether it will become one of the criteria for testing a real handsome guy, but the cover, interviews, and special topics of "Time Magazine" have no problems no matter how you look at it, It still triggered the idle guesses of a group of boring people who were marked with the label of "seeing micro-knowledge": Could Time Warner not be able to withstand the check attack of the big capitalists?

This conjecture seems so unbelievable?

Well, it's not that much, it's 'very'.

If you add that "Time Magazine" is a magazine owned by Time Warner, a big media giant, and "big capitalist" refers to one of the founders of ET Films, who is also the chairman of Stark Industries, a genius, a billionaire, Iron Man multi-talented Tony Stark's synopsis and Tony Stark's ambitious proposal for ET Films' future goals at a party on the day of the premiere of The Truman Show To enter the superhero movie market, according to people familiar with the matter, Mr. Iron Man’s favorite comic hero is Batman. This is a summary, and now Hollywood superheroes are not superheroes in reality, but in comics. That is, the copyrights of the superheroes in Two-dimensional belong to DC Comics, and DC Entertainment, the parent company of DC Comics, was acquired by Time Warner 30 years ago.

If this series of relationships is sorted out smoothly, that is to say, if ET Films, mainly Tony Stark, wants to make superhero movies with money and willfulness, especially Batman movies, then it is bound to be because of copyright issues. There is an interest dispute with Time Warner.

As for how Eric Xavier got involved, oh c'mon, he's the other co-founder of ET Films and has an unusual relationship with Tony Stark.

By the way, there is absolutely no insinuation here.

As soon as such associations came out, the executives of the eight major Hollywood film companies all seemed to breathe a sigh of relief.

Why is this so?

This is because the current Hollywood superhero movie market is very sluggish. Big-budget superhero movies have encountered Waterloo one after another, like "Batman and Robin" released last year. Arnold Schwarzenegger (Freeze), Uma Thurman (Poison Ivy), Chris O'Donnell (Robin) and other hot superhero movies, the production cost alone is as high as 1.25 million However, it lost both box office and word-of-mouth after its release. In terms of word-of-mouth, it was rated No.50 among the 1 worst movies of the era, and it is known as the worst movie ever put on the screen; in terms of box office , "Batman and Robin" caused Warner Bros. Pictures to lose at least 0.8 million US dollars.Since then, the film company has been discolored by superhero movies. It's no wonder that Tony is rich and willful-interested in losing money.

Another point is that the first project of ET Films, "The Lord of the Rings", was originally a tricky project, otherwise other film companies would have already sharpened their knives.And because it is reported that "The Lord of the Rings" will be filmed into a trilogy like the original trilogy, and it will still be in the form of a set, so the budget alone will approach [-] million U.S. dollars.I don’t know that ET Films is overconfident about “Lord of the Rings”, and they don’t think overconfidence is arrogance. They invest so much in one brain, and they still take a set shoot instead of making a film to see how it will look after it’s released... I think I want to see if the first one fails, then under the domino effect, just wait for "The Lord of the Rings" to become a gold-absorbing black hole!

Anyway, the fear of the Hollywood tycoons under the wait-and-see attitude has been so weak.Of course, when asked about the ambition of ET Films to enter the superhero movie market, did they quote one of the co-founders' classic words "rich and self-willed" to make fun of it, or the meaning is unclear He said, "Is that Iron Man, a superhero but a superhero".

God knows, this thing (ET Films' entry into the superhero market) it's not actually strongly substantiated.

And, God only knows if Tony Iron Man, billionaire, party freak Stark, was awake when he made the bold words.

However, the bigwigs in Hollywood were not slapped in the face by the parties, although Tony, as the instigator, failed to find any relevant memories in his genius brain after reading the follow-up report on "Superhero Conjecture".

This is awkward.

Fortunately, there is also the caring and omniscient Jarvis, who reminded Tony: "Mr. Hogan brought you a Batman-related comic at the party, sir."

"Happy?" Tony repeated the nickname of his bodyguard and friend, vaguely remembering something.Tony is still tirelessly looking for new goals for Stark Industries that are in line with the interests of the country and society (Tony), and at the same time he is constantly improving his steel suit and setting new goals for himself. Also following #帝上不急太长急#, Happy found out the Batman comics on a whim for Tony's reference.Of course, the most famous superhero in DC comics has been and is still Superman, but there is no analogy between Superman and aliens. Looking at the superheroes of DC comics, Batman has the most similarities with Tony.

And then, probably under the influence of alcohol, Tony expressed his opinion on that comic, and Tony is a highly anticipated figure, and his casual words are worth money, considering that the media is willing to spend money to listen " A source close to the situation said what he said.

Tony thought about it, glanced at the report again, and raised his eyebrows: "Jarvis, help me answer Mr. Eric Xavier's private call."

——Look for someone to clean up the mess?