innocence method

?No.

No.

Seven cats bowed their waists, facing the inside of the refrigerator.

"Hey."

Ah—ah, I said that I was so hungry all morning.

No chips or chocolate, this heavenly fridge has everything but no junk food, eats like a god these days, and finds no purpose in life...

"Hey!"

Finally pulled my head out of the freezer.

"...If you want to do it, do it quickly." The wolf didn't look at him, bowed his head, and bent his fingers.

"I can't stay in this garbage-like place for a minute."

"And you, monkey." He grabbed the monkey's back collar and stabbed—— la.The other party even brought the chair to his feet. "Let's join hands with me. That one over there," he raised his chin and pointed seven: "It's almost time to do it. Do you think I didn't notice?"

"What the hell?" the monkey rubbing the back of its neck asked with a temper.

Qi looked at the wolf and couldn't help but laugh.

I really admire you - he really wanted to say. ——How can such a thing be considered in such a mental state?

Dog's sentence was 106 years.

When the mink and the sheep were killed, the sentence could not be reduced because they had not been divided into groups and did not have the status of "killer".That is: 106+50+50=206, after that:

Fish killing case: (206+50)/2=128

Broken sheep case: 128/2=64

Broken fish case: 64/2=32

Bull case: 32/2=16

Jelly case: 16/2=8

Broken bird case: 8/2=4

Then, it is stated in the rules: During the experiment, those who have been sentenced to less than (≤) one year in prison can be "released without charge" at any time

"—that guy has to solve the case twice more for the dog to get an acquittal—just the two of you and us."

"Wolf, you win." Qi sighed.I'm indeed short of two divisors, so I'm sorry, I'm going to use some tricks to get the first one—"The dog killed the mink, and the method used was to pierce the throat directly with a ballpoint pen." He said solemnly explain.

"——Don't look at me like that. When a dog kills a mink, although it is not a 'killer', the sentence cannot be reduced, but the rules do not say that the case that the 'detective' wants to solve must be committed by the 'killer'."—— Yes, it did not say that the case cannot be "obvious".

So now the dog's remaining sentence is: 4/2=2

"Well... what should we do next. What do you two mean by that expression?" Qi smiled honestly and kindly.Really, haven't I already said that I don't intend to attack the two present here.Moreover, the next divisor is the highlight:

——Yes, this experiment is not over yet, and there is still one "true murderer" who has not been accused.Then, the true meaning of the experiment is also—

"Here, let's read it again." Qi slapped the seventh edition of the "Experimental Rules" that had been in his hands for a long time on the table.

1. Two people form a team, one of them is a "killer" and the other is a "detective".The identities of both parties will be determined by the lottery arranged later; [Why are there detectives? 】

2. The killer has the right to kill any person in the experiment; if one person is killed, the sentence of two people in the same group will be halved;

4. Detectives have the right to testify against the real culprit, but they must correctly explain the circumstances of the case and the method of committing the crime; the testimonial must be carried out in the presence of all existing persons.For anyone who successfully testifies against one person, the sentence of two people in the same group will be halved; if the reasoning is wrong, the sentence will be increased by [-]%.Detectives are not allowed to kill, otherwise they will be executed immediately, except for those who are in self-defense; [Why can’t detectives kill people? 】

4. Those who do not participate in the group within 24 hours after the start of the experiment will be executed immediately, except when there is no one to form the group; once the group is decided, it cannot be changed midway; if there is a single order during the experiment, it cannot be regrouped.In any case, the single person only has the status of "killer" or "detective"; [Why can't they be regrouped? 】

5. Killers are not allowed to attack people in the same group, otherwise they will be executed immediately; [Why group? 】

7. Detectives in the same group cannot reason about the crimes committed by the killers in this group, unless no one successfully solves the case until the end of the experiment;

8. During the experiment, those whose prison term is less than (≤) one year can be "released without charge" at any time;

All ["true culprits"] have been accused, and the game end condition is met;

Even if no one meets the "acquittal" condition, the 7X24-hour experiment ends automatically.

Read this rule again with all the emotions you have built up, love, hate, ... and the experiment - it's over!

"Next, answer the question."

"First question, why is the identity of 'detective' used in this experiment?"

"Ah? Of course it's because—" "To find out the 'true culprit'." The wolf stopped the monkey with his hand, signaling that no matter what the man opposite said, he would answer.

"Correct. Then the second question, why should we group them? If it is only for someone to find out the 'true murderer', it is enough for each person to have the functions of 'detective' and 'murderer' at the same time-why separate them deliberately Woolen cloth?"

"I'm afraid this is...to protect 'Detective'?"

"That's great, Wolf. You've got such a clever mind."

But the wolf didn't take over. "If everyone is both a detective and a killer, the game will probably become a simple battle with each other—but now because of the iron rule that a killer can't touch the same team of detectives, the killer has to rely on the detective's judgment if he wants to win— —That is to say, 'grouping' is a mechanism to protect the identity of 'detective'."

"In that case, why can't 'detectives' kill people?"

The wolf stopped.

"The 'killer' can solve the case, and the 'detective' can also kill—but both of them can only reduce their sentences when they have done their own 'duties'—in this way, the detective can protect himself and test the efficiency of the crime." Isn't it more functional and more balanced? Why is it like this-unilaterally allowing the 'killer' to solve the case, but not allowing the 'detective' to kill?"

"..."

"It doesn't matter, it will be explained soon after answering the following questions. The third question. If the grouping is to protect the identity of the detective, why can't it be 'regrouped'?"

"It's very simple—to make people cherish the concept of 'teaming'. If the other member of the team dies, the remaining detectives will have no way to protect themselves, and the remaining killers will fall into an embarrassing situation that even if they solve the case, it will be useless." ——That's why the two of them will protect the 'grouping' even more... What do you mean? What's the use of asking these things!"

"Don't worry." Qi raised one hand. "Wolf, don't you think it's strange what you said just now. The special rules are to protect the 'group', and the protection of the 'group' is to protect the 'detective', and the protection of the 'detective' is to detect the 'true culprit'. ——Don’t you think this contradicts what you said earlier?”

"what?"

"It's the fact that this experiment is a 'judgment mechanism'. It is enough to induce us to kill each other as criminals' judgment mechanism--with the current setup, it seems that all the arrows are pointing to the 'see through the real murderer'" The four words are the same. Why is it so important to see through but not to see through the 'true culprit'?" Qi smiled lightly, pushed the table forward and stood up.

"Then here is the last question. Use your clever mind to try to answer—"

"What do these two words mean?"

As if wanting to lift the fog in front of him, the wolf looked there with his hands brushing the corners of his eyes.The seven fingers standing there who are not tall and courageous are pointing to the last rule of the "game rules", all the "true murderers" are accused, and the word "true murderer" is circled in blue circle when the game end condition is fulfilled .

This rule is very strange.He found it strange from the beginning, but without anyone pointing it out, he assumed that it was a grammatical oversight in the rules: when did "all" murderers be accused?Kill a person, testify, and the game is over?Or does it count when all eight people are killed and only the last group remains?The "true culprit" with double quotation marks in the end -

However, before answering, Seven bent down her upper body.