The Multiverse Starting from White Deer Plain

As soon as these three policy questions came out, Bai Gui glanced around the field and found that many candidates were secretly complaining, but there were still some candidates who showed confidence and answered as soon as they picked up their pens. Read 520 official website

Looking around, he found that among the candidates who he felt were in good condition, five or six of them were classmates he had met in the normal school. It seemed that they had the same connections as him and had entered the normal school.

Others are studying in other institutions of higher learning.

As for those who complain, naturally they have no way out and can only study hard in the countryside.

It looks like the same test paper, but as soon as you enter the venue, people are divided into different grades.

These test questions are somewhat related to the test questions of the Normal School a few days ago. It is not in depth, but by analogy, if you read a few more current articles, you can probably roughly estimate how to answer them.

This exam question is considered reasonable. I heard that there are also people writing policy questions on the opening of the Suez Canal and so on...

"Of these three policy questions, the first two are not very difficult. The first question can be answered by just reading more foreign historical materials. The second question analyzes agriculture, which was discussed in Shiwu Zhai's Agricultural Science. I also I have specially studied it carefully, and as for the third question..."

"Those who have recorded demerits have no difficulty in taking the exam, but those who have not recorded demerits are left to their own devices and will inevitably fall behind..."

Bai Gui briefly analyzed the three policy issues. After all, it is a government examination. The second difficulty in testing a scholar is not a major examination such as the provincial examination, the general examination, or the palace examination. It cannot be compared to the level of solving problems for the country. They are not children yet. Only those who have passed the government examination are considered a child, and they have no qualifications to provide advice and suggestions for the country. These three policy questions are actually the test of erudition and memorization ability.

Of course, if you have not practiced eight-legged essay and are not familiar with some rhyme and rhyme techniques, even if you can answer the three policy questions, the article will be dry and boring to read. The examiner will not admit such a candidate.

After pondering for a while, he had an idea in his mind. He raised his pen and wrote on the scroll, "There is a saying from Western Confucianism: 'When two equals meet, public law is power; when two equals meet, power is public law.' I recite his words every time. Sadly, the sincerity of public law cannot be relied upon, and relying on public law is an excuse for the powerful."

He first determined the nature of a policy question, that is, the argument of the policy question.

The best policy papers are those where the arguments come from the mouths of sages. In the past life of college entrance examination education, Chinese teachers had already taught them.

In fact, the Western Confucian view of this sentence is derived from Rousseau's theory of equality and Spencer's theory of evolution. At this time, there were two theories in the academic world, one was the egalitarian school, which respected Rousseau's "On the Civil Covenant". ”, the other is the powerful one, which is Spencer’s “Evolution”.

And who is the person who refined this point of view?

It was Liang Rengong who wrote in "On Similarities and Differences in the Changes of National Thoughts" in 1901, seven years ago: "When two equals meet, there is no need for power, and reason is power; when two equals meet, there is no need for reason, and power is reason."

The Reform Movement was a reform movement, and it was not a serious matter. Now that Emperor Guangxu and the Queen Mother of the West have passed away, this sentence has nothing to do with the current situation.

Besides, he also changed his original words.

If a scholar plagiarizes, can that be called plagiarism? This is called learning from Liang Rengong’s point of view!

There are countless references like this, and the streets are full of theoretical expositions of Rousseau and Spencer.

The meaning of this sentence is also very simple. When two equal countries meet, international law is the greatest power. But when two unequal countries meet, strength is power!

Next is the explanation of this argument: "In the past hundred years, all the countries in Europe and the West have been evenly matched, and there is no one who can enrich himself by barren people. However, in the name of preserving the land, when he suddenly heard about it, he may have had no choice but to pay for it. No matter what... after all, it doesn't start with righteousness and end with benefit. He is a human being who does what he wants. This is how clever foreign policy is."

Taixi means big and extreme, so Taixi generally refers to Western countries.

What this sentence means is that on Europa, all countries are evenly matched and cannot kill any country, but it costs too much money and food, so other countries can only ask for compensation. Over time, this kind of foreign policy practice has been formed...

After writing this paragraph, it is time to cite historical materials.

When it comes to policy questions, the most important thing is to cite evidence to illustrate that your point of view is correct.

"In the past, when Napoleon wanted to attack the British, the British seized the Danish navy in self-defense, and in order to protect Spain and Portugal, they stationed troops to interfere in their internal affairs. At that time, it was nothing wrong, and it was in compliance with public law. In the end, the British controlled the sea. It is a matter of having full power without resistance."

"The Congress of Vienna was to preserve the situation in Europe. It took what Napoleon destroyed and built it one by one. The name is not unfair, but it is what it is. Russia and Austria divided Poland, Sousson ceded territory to Prussia, and the Netherlands gained the Rhine River. Upstream, the general trend of British specialization in the Mediterranean is another thing."

"The Battle of Crimea..."

Soon, historical materials were listed one by one, and the arguments were rigorous.

Bai Gui ended this first policy question with the last sentence: "Ugh, protecting the land is based on the fine principles of public law, but it is just a means of extorting profits for others, and it is not expected by public law."

As for the example of the Qing court ceding territory and paying compensation, he would not violate any taboos.

Adults also need face.

The second policy statement talks about the system of the Zhou Dynasty, which is the most detailed in terms of agricultural management. In recent years of research on agriculture in various countries, most people believe that human management is more important than climate, and the key points are land, capital, and labor. Being able to correctly use these three resources really depends on knowledge. Now a new academic system has been set up to list agriculture as an independent subject, hoping to retain the academic results of agricultural research. Please state the approach to agricultural education.

For this kind of policy problem, what effective methods can ordinary scholars come up with?

Just like the answer to the question of later generations, you only need to list the recent agricultural policies. It is best to use the methods of other countries to make suggestions and suggestions, but this should not be too much. It is best to mention one or two points, and do not mention more.

If you write too much, do you think the adults in the court are stupid pigs?

Although the imperial examination was changed to focus on policy questions, it was the same as the previous practice. The most important thing was the first test. As long as you passed the first test and entered the group case, you could pass the next few exams on your own.

The first question also focuses on the first question. As the name suggests, it is the first question.

Whether he is dismissed or not depends on how the first question is written. There are nearly 1,500 people in the government examination. How can the examiner have the time and mood to read each question carefully? If you don’t write the first question well, you’ll just give up.

For the next two questions, Bai Gui had already drafted them. He considered and revised them word by word. He would never make any taboos. He was the head of the case and basically knew how to decide on admission, so he shouldn't make small mistakes.

Stability is the most important thing.