World of Gods

In my recent situation, after posting chapters at noon, I read the first round of book reviews about half an hour later, mainly looking for typos and typos found by readers, and correcting them as soon as possible, so that subsequent readers can read more fluently.

After that, in the evening or the next day, I will read the second round of book reviews to see the feedback from readers.

Saw some feedback recently.

For example, some readers said that they don't like the interaction between male and female characters. This is normal feedback, I can understand it, and I will find ways to improve it.

However, some readers will say these chapters are inexplicable, or these chapters are poisonous, I think the motivation of these readers is want this book to be better, first of all, I would like to express my gratitude.

But here comes the problem. I read these comments repeatedly. I really don’t know what “inexplicable” is, and I don’t know where the “poisonous spot” is. It is the characters, the plot, the action, and the description. Is it rhetorical, foreshadowing, or something else.

So, I hope all readers do me a favor, when expressing feedback, try to say which specific paragraph or specific thing is wrong, so that I can understand.

For example, what do I think of Holt's character?

For example, I think this rhetoric is too exaggerated. It's awkward to use milk or cream.

For example, I think the performance of the five burning men rolling around in this episode is not good enough, it needs to be more explosive.

Only by saying this can I understand, otherwise I really can't understand, even if I want to improve my brain, I can't do it.

The reason is simple, each of us perceives in a different way.

I just discovered this problem recently. Everyone’s cognition is like a ring. Everyone uses their own rings to cover things. Unfortunately, everyone’s rings are like our fingerprints or irises. They seem similar, but they are actually very different. , so it caused a lot of misunderstanding between people.

For those top people in various industries, either the ring is very large and can accommodate many differences, or there are more rings to set different things separately. This is the realm I am pursuing.

Uh, it seems that I have said too much, but I can probably explain the meaning clearly anyway.

Well, let me mention a general three-step feedback pattern

, I think the specific problem is that the flame goblin is a poisonous point.

, the specific reason is because I think the flame goblin's butt is not upright enough (squint small expression)

, the specific improvement makes the flame goblin's buttocks a little bit more! For example, written in the shape of a peach...

That’s about it. Of course, if you’re too lazy, just write the first two points.

Because the clearer and more complete your writing is, the more clearly I can see it, and the more likely this book will be improved.

Otherwise, you have been typing for a long time, but you just don’t speak clearly. I am confused, and it may even have the opposite effect-this is the root of misunderstanding between men and women, don’t ask me how I know...

Finally, thanks to every reader!

dhijianxian0

.