Chapter 172

After the plaintiff submitted these pieces of evidence, there was no other evidence to submit. They believed that no evidence was needed for the joint property of the husband and wife, because the money her husband gave to others must belong to the joint property of the husband and wife.The reason why the agreement is invalid is because the defendant is the mistress, and the breakup agreement reached with her husband violates public order and good customs, so it is invalid.

There are cases in this regard, so the plaintiff's lawyer was very confident about this. He sat there with his chest raised high, as if no one else could see it.

"Does the defendant have any evidence to submit?" the judge asked the plaintiff after the plaintiff submitted his evidence.

Meng Lang also submitted the agreement, saying: "We have no other evidence to submit, only this agreement, which is in the hands of the defendant, and the content of the proof is that the 50 is the third party's compensation for the defendant's loss, isn't it The breakup fee is not a kind of gift, the third party deceived the defendant's feelings, and the third party compensated the defendant, which does not violate the law, so it is a valid agreement, and the plaintiff's claim cannot be established."

The plaintiff's lawyer testified: "The defendant, as the mistress, had an extramarital affair with the plaintiff's husband, which violated the plaintiff's legal rights. Whatever the name of the money given to the defendant by the third party should be invalid, the defendant’s claim is very absurd and unreasonable.”

Meng Lang was not happy.

The words of the plaintiff's attorney were too sharp.

He immediately said coldly: "What evidence does the plaintiff have to prove that the defendant is a mistress? When the defendant fell in love with the third person, he didn't even know that the third person was married. How can he say that she is a mistress? The plaintiff's lawyer said that my client is Xiaosan, this is an insult to my client, please pay attention to your words."

After hearing this, the plaintiff's lawyer said disdainfully: "Does this still need evidence? What is being in love with a married man other than a mistress? I did not insult the defendant. Mistress is a neutral term, and she is a third party. If you don’t intervene, what else can you say?”

Cheng Ningning's face was blue and purple when he said this. As a lawyer and a woman, why did he speak so sharply?

Meng Lang glanced at the plaintiff's lawyer and said: "A lawsuit is all about evidence. Without evidence, it is useless to talk nonsense in court. I remind the plaintiff again that the defendant did not know when he was interacting with a third person. The third party is married, so she is not the mistress in the usual sense. For example, the third party may be suspected of bigamy, but because my client does not know that she is living with a married man, she cannot be held responsible for bigamy. The law does not force a person to bear the responsibility that is detrimental to him. The principle of consistency between subjectivity and objectivity must be adhered to. As the saying goes, the ignorant is not guilty. Why should the law punish a weak woman who was deceived? The plaintiff's lawyer is also a woman, so she should Understand women's emotional weaknesses and difficulties, rather than forcing others to do something difficult and insisting that my client is a mistress who is despised by everyone!"

When meng lang said these words, everyone was moved, especially the women in the court, including a female judge.

Sitting next to him, Niu Zhao suddenly heard his words, and couldn't help being touched, turned to look at him, thinking that Meng Lang understands women very well, what a man he is!
After hearing what he said, the plaintiff's lawyer snorted: "The law is the law. The defendant's lawyer kept saying that the defendant did not know that the third person was a married woman. Is this possible? In five years, she didn't Knowing that the third person is a married man, who would believe it? If everyone says it like she did, and I didn’t know he was a married man, then will there be no mistresses in the world? What the defendant’s lawyer said is clearly a sophistry!"

The courtroom was filled with loud voices. Although the plaintiff's lawyer was a girl, her voice was loud and imposing, as if she had taken the moral high ground. As soon as her words fell, discussions began in the auditorium, pointing at Cheng Ningning, what the plaintiff's lawyer said Yes, it's been five years. Could it be that he has been kept in the dark, not knowing that the man is a married man?It must be deliberately pretending not to know, so as to shamelessly continue to entangle with others.

Seeing the plaintiff's lawyer performing like this, Meng Lang knew that he had met an opponent. At this moment, Niu Zhao suddenly said, "Please tell the plaintiff's lawyer to speak with evidence. What evidence do you have to prove that our client knew the third person Is it a married man? Is it possible that after a long time of dating, you can know this matter? The third person is deeply hidden, and my client has never known that he is a married man, is it impossible?"

Seeing Niu Zhao going into battle to confront her, the plaintiff's lawyer immediately said: "Excuse me, you said that she didn't know that the third person was a married woman. What evidence do you have to prove it?"

Meng Lang immediately pointed to the agreement on the table and said, "The agreement already stated that the third party deceived my client's feelings, so he compensated her. Isn't this enough proof?"

"Although it says deception, it doesn't say that the defendant was deceived in this respect, so how can you be sure that the defendant does not know that he is a mistress?"

Meng Lang couldn't help but sneered and said, "The third person is here now, so just ask him if it's a deception in this regard."

The plaintiff's lawyer said, "Okay, let's ask."

Seeing her so calm, Meng Lang suddenly realized that it was not good. If the third person and the plaintiff wore a pair of pants, wouldn't the result be bad for Cheng Ningning?
He thought about it, and quickly looked at the third person with dim eyes, using a little trick. He didn't want the third person to lie for Cheng Ningning, but he also didn't want him to lie for the plaintiff.

When the judge heard this, he began to ask the third person, what is the situation like?
Both the plaintiff and her attorney turned to look at the third person. The key to the case is what the third person said. If the third person insisted that Cheng Ningning knew in advance that he was married, then this matter would be more difficult. It's done, it's hard to tell the truth from the fake.

He might lose the case, but if he speaks truthfully, Cheng Ningning has more than [-]% chance of winning.

Speaking of which, the culprit was the third man, but I didn't expect that the last two women would pin their hopes on him, which is also strange.Thinking about the man's pride, Meng Lang really wanted to take a picture of him with a picture of good and evil to see what kind of person he was.

At this moment, the third person was sitting there with his head down, as if he was thinking about something. Meng Lang looked at him with dim eyes for a while, to see if it would work. If it didn't work, he might stand on the plaintiff's side Talk, because he came with the plaintiff, obviously, the two may reconcile as before, and there is no conflict.

(End of this chapter)

Tap the screen to use advanced tools Tip: You can use left and right keyboard keys to browse between chapters.

You'll Also Like