Daming: I asked you to hang yourself, but I didn’t ask you to rebuild the Ming Dynasty

Chapter 660 It turns out that words can be reversed, and so can time.

——"There was an imperial edict (original text "Shangri", which is a variant of "edict") that sent the Yin and Shang Dynasties to Dani and moved Helan. It is not more detailed. People misunderstand this, or it is said that Helan has developed skills. …”

("Waiting for death and Xu" is an unfinished sentence on the previous page, and the sentence is broken at "There is a difference")

(I would venture to guess that they may not understand what "Shang Ri" means, so they simply don't need this sentence... Anyway, they don't understand...)

What do you mean?

If you want to quote information, then post the original text. We won’t do it if you quote it out of context.

The vernacular translation is:

“In the past, Chinese envoys visited the Great Mud Kingdom, and (this matter) was grafted onto the Dutch, causing misunderstanding among the world.

If you want to say who has more advanced technology (the Ming Dynasty) or the Netherlands, (our country surpasses the Netherlands, it refers to the Ming Dynasty), that is, ships and guns, (our country's) captain is so wide...the thickness of the hull is only five or six inches. The deck is two feet thick. "

(In ancient Chinese, "purpose" needs to be in the top case. This is called "raising the head", and "emperor, saint, heaven", etc. are also written in this way.)

Take a look - is their "evidence" reliable?

Eight words - "Pretend to understand when you don't understand, just copy the old facts."

Maybe he "understands" and pretends to "don't understand"?

If China’s technology is not so dark, how can it prove the power of the West?

Okay, you can just do what you want!

I deleted several pages later and added this sentence——

"What we call red barbarian cannon today refers to its system."

I Nima...

Does anyone study ancient Chinese? Or do you know anyone who studies ancient Chinese?

You cover up the "Everyone knows" section and ask the previous section separately to see if that's what I translated it!

Then show him the second half - I guarantee his face... will be wonderful!

Why?

He himself wants to overturn the translation just now!

The propaganda was too deeply rooted in the hearts of the people...

……

Here comes the key point - "The ship uses iron as a net!"

What does this sentence mean?

Is it an external iron plate or iron as the keel?

The specific meaning of this sentence is still unclear.

This "net" actually means literally - that is, the outer surface of the ship is covered with iron plates...

Still according to the convention of classical Chinese, it means network, veins, muscles and bones - that is, using steel as the keel of the ship...

If we compare the ships of the Ming Dynasty with their terrifying appearance and size, this "ship uses iron as a net"...

It’s an iron keel!

Only the iron keel can accurately prove the huge size of the treasure ship in the record!

Because only the keel made of steel can make the ship so big!

……

If this inference is true - then the level of technology is even more terrifying!

……

but--

No matter what it means, according to the records in this book, we don’t care whether it has steel as its keel or is covered with steel...

The advanced level of Fengzhou in the Ming Dynasty could be directly surpassed by around 1860!

As for ‘what we call red barbarian cannon today is its system’, it even raises another question——

Where did the Hongyi Cannon come from?

Is the Hongyi cannon a learned Western technology?

How did you learn Western technology?

Today's overwhelming propaganda is that Hongyi Cannon belongs to the Western School headed by Xu Guangqi and learned advanced technology from the West.

Although this statement has become mainstream.

It has even become an axiom.

However, this is exactly contrary to the historical data currently being excavated!

Based on the compilation of coastal county chronicles of Guangdong, we have reached a conclusion that is different from that of today’s mainstream academic circles:

Today’s explanation of the Hongyi cannon: It is a Western artillery introduced by the Western School headed by Xu Guangqi after the Apocalypse.

Pay attention to this point in time - after Tianqi takes the throne.

However, whether it is recorded in the county annals of the Ming Dynasty or the records of Westerners at the Macau Artillery Factory, they all say something else -

In the middle of Wanli period, Hongyi cannons had appeared on the coast.

In the 31st year of Wanli (1603), the local firearms manufacturing department in Fujian produced a batch of Hongyi cannons weighing 3580 kilograms each.

Not one subject, but a batch. The specific number is unknown.

We will make 3580 kilograms of Hongyi cannon when we come up...

And it can be used after casting...

Obviously, this technology was already mature as early as 1603.

At the very least, the experience has been accumulated to the level where one can directly cast a three-thousand-jin artillery piece.

In other words, the specific time when the Hongyi Cannon appears must be pushed forward!

Because no matter how awesome the stuff in the laboratory is, you still need to accumulate experience bit by bit.

No country can directly build nuclear weapons, right?

Tianqi reigned from 1621 to 1627.

can never...

As early as 20 years ago...

The craftsmen in Fujian collectively traveled through time and used the technology of 20 years later to make weapons 20 years ago?

……

So, before Xu Guangqi "introduced" the Red Yi Cannon, had the Red Yi Cannon become popular?

Have!

In the first year of Tianqi, Haikang County, Leizhou Prefecture, Guangdong Province.

In a mere county town, there are more than 20 red barbarian cannons weighing more than a thousand kilograms at the top of the city!

During the same period, in Yangjiang County, Zhaoqing Prefecture, the county magistrate's memorial to Tianqi also showed red cannons weighing more than a thousand kilograms. It was also a county town, with more than 20 cannons!

These two records have not been deleted from "Records of Xizong".

It is estimated that the workload of "erasing history" was too huge for Zhang Tingyu to handle, so he was able to retain it.

Xu Guangqi first suggested the introduction of Hongyi cannon in the 48th year of Wanli - 1620.

…………

Let's talk about the craftsman system of the Ming Dynasty - every six months, the capital's firearms bureaus were guarded in turn.

In this situation:

It has appeared on the land of China for a long time, and the weapons are at least 20 years old, but the capital does not know about it?

This leads to two more inferences:

One: The emperor of the Ming Dynasty has been completely sidelined by the bureaucracy and has lost all rights to the local area!

Second: History books are lying!

……

After Emperor Tianqi succeeded to the throne, Xu Guangqi vowed to go to the Macau Artillery Factory to buy Hongyi cannons...

Precisely, in the third year of the Apocalypse, Francisco Mascarenhas, the first governor of Macau, signed a contract with the local gunsmiths in Guangdong for the Bocaro (Bugarao) foundry, employing Ming. A contract for artificial cannon.

The text above is a contract, and the picture below is "Bing Lu" written in the 34th year of Wanli. The picture is Hongyi Cannon.

According to this contract, all the iron artillery produced in Macau were made by Ming Dynasty craftsmen.

Moreover, Akito specifically requested that the Portuguese should not secretly learn their cannon-making techniques!

and then?

The artillery produced in Macao is in turn sold well in European countries!

Most of the steel-made red barbarian cannons of this period that can be found in the West in later generations came from the Bokaro Foundry in Macau.

(In the end, the steel cannon technology was not preserved. After it spread to Europe, the Bokaro Cannon Foundry began to decline.)

(As mentioned before, steel cannon technology generally originated during the Zhu Houzhao period.)

This contract has been preserved.

Wu Zhiliang, a doctor of history, has a book called "Early Macao History", which not only contains the full text of this contract, but also proves another thing -

In "The Beginning of the Cannon Foundry in Bocaro, Macau" and "A Portuguese Mission with Chinese as Ambassadors", he used Chinese and foreign historical materials to restore a terrible fact:

The main creators of the so-called advanced European technology were actually people from the Ming Dynasty...

The so-called introduction of "Portugal to help the Ming Dynasty build artillery regiments" by Xu Guangqi turned out to be a fraud led by people from the Ming Dynasty...

Awesome Klass!

Xu Guangqi introduced Portuguese artillery—actually using the Ming Dynasty’s own technology to deceive the Zhu family emperor!

According to Dr. Wu Zhiliang's argument, the so-called Hongyi cannon should have appeared in the early Wanli period at least.

Where do you come from?

Nanyang!

So where did Nanyang's artillery come from?

Not to mention the time, even in modern times - the Nanyang area is dominated by the people of Guangdong and Fujian...

No matter where it comes from - it can never be introduced by Xu Guangqi!

Because - the "Bing Lu" written in the 34th year of Wanli (1606) actually clearly records the Hongyi cannon.

Isn’t that strange?

……

Later generations take the things of their predecessors and pretend to be advanced...

Awesome Klass!

ps: I haven’t been online these days, so I’ll try to update the third update today.

The next chapter is at night.

Tap the screen to use advanced tools Tip: You can use left and right keyboard keys to browse between chapters.

You'll Also Like